Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, January 07, 2008 <br />Page 10 <br />d. Consider Adopting 2009 Budget Calendar <br />City Manager Malinen provided a suggested 2009 budget calendar, noting the ad- <br />dition of a Public Hearing during the summer months to hear citizen or stake- <br />holder budget suggestions or requests. City Manager Malinen also noted the ear- <br />lier City Council deadline for submitting individual budget suggestions or re- <br />quests. <br />Discussion included advantages of advisory group strategic planning and initia- <br />tives early in the budgeting process; public sense of where their tax monies were <br />being spent outside departments and staff needs (i.e., external agencies); and the <br />context of presentations by external groups (i.e., preferred explanation of their <br />purpose and activities, rather than a pitch for money). <br />Mayor Klausing expressed support for moving up the Council deadline for sub- <br />mitting individual budget suggestions or requests. <br />Councilmember Pust spoke in support of the overall calendar; however, ques- <br />tioned inclusion of performance-based management and/or budgeting, and how to <br />facilitate that into the budgeting process. Councilmember Pust spoke in support <br />of initiating performance-based budgeting now, if the Council was still interested <br />in doing so; and questioned how that would affect this proposed calendar. <br />Mayor Klausing expressed his interest in budgeting for outcomes; however, noted <br />that during previous discussions, management staffing changes were taking place, <br />and suggested that City Manager Malinen be allowed time to express his interest <br />in pursuing the process, if the Council was still interested. <br />Councilmember Pust suggested that further discussion be held regarding whether <br />budgeting for outcomes works in a local government context, when 86% of the <br />budget represented fixed costs for staff; or whether discussions and considerations <br />were simply driven by timing in past fiscal years. Councilmember Pust opined <br />that there was substantial information available from those past discussions to fa- <br />cilitate arenewed discussion to determine if it will work "yet" or "ever." <br />Council consensus was to add discussion on performance based management and <br />budgeting as a future agenda item. <br />Councilmember Roe suggested an addition to the proposed calendar, at the begin- <br />ning of the year, to project 2009 residential and commercial property values, and <br />the anticipated tax base (i.e., status of TIF Districts, legislative changes impacting <br />municipal taxes); prior to or concurrent with budget goals and priorities. <br />