Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, February 25, 2008 <br />Page 14 <br />Codes Coordinator Don Munson and Code Enforcement Officer Rick Talbot pro- <br />vided apresentation on land use code enforcement procedures and programs, <br />comparisons of surrounding cities, and options for consideration and further dis- <br />cussion, as previously requested by the City Council. <br />Staff provided a bench handout prepared by Mr. Muivson entitled, "Land Use <br />Code Enforcement -Options for Council's Consideration." <br />Mr. Munson noted that staff had met with staff from ten other conununities with <br />similar aged housing stock; and a comparison matrix of their procedures and pro- <br />grams was part ol'the staff reporC. Considerations were based on similar housing <br />and population sizes; which departments handled code enforcement; nwnber of <br />full-time employees; yearly budget; number of cases; and whether seasonal em- <br />ployees were used. Further considerations included proactive versus reactive en- <br />forcement; fines; administrative tickets; abatements; court citations; and council <br />involvement. <br />Several innovative programs and methods were highlighted, such as canvassing <br />neighborhoods for violations (i.e., "Shoreview Shines"); escalating <br />fines/mandatory fines, charging fees for abatements; assigning unpaid fines and <br />fees to taxes; free trash pick-up; informational brochures; segments on cable <br />channels; rental licensing; and point-of--sale inspections. <br />Trends observed included aging-in-place populations (with code enforcement <br />compliance issues related to finances or physical incapacities); assistance pro- <br />grams; more proactive enforcement; more aggressive enforcement; canvassing of <br />neighborhoods for violations; over-crowding of rental properties; and covering <br />costs through fines and fees. <br />Staff provided other duties of the Land Use/Code Enforcement officials; process- <br />ing commitment for the enforcement process whether through abatement or Ram- <br />sey County Court Citation; compassionate compliance programming; seasonal is- <br />sues creating needed extensions for compliance; and volunteers and agencies util- <br />ized by staff in assisting in code compliance. <br />Staff further highlighted the department's flexibility in working with those mak- <br />ing an honest effort and progressing toward compliance, differences in City <br />Council direction for intensity of enforcement, from 1997 to-date; average num- <br />ber of compliance over the last five years at 441, similar to other cities; with fif- <br />teen court citations issued over the last ten years; 32 abatements performed in <br />2007; 7 administrative tickets issues in 2007; and recent modification to notice <br />language making it stronger. Staff noted that of a total of 425 cases in 2007, 404 <br />(95%) had been closed, 21 remaining open (5%). Staff noted the other day-to-day <br />duties and workload in the department with approximately 150 annual inspec- <br />