2006-02-21_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville - HRA Minutes for February 21, 2006Page 3 of 6 Member Bean noted that most people who hire an architect do go through the process regardless of the grant award but that they are able to supplement the project with additional funds and lessen their financial burden. Director Bennett explained the DRC review comments and Phase I and Phase II of the project improvements. Mr. Lindgren suggested that Phase II was two years in the future. The neighborhood is turning over with more families and he believes more will change in the near future and there will be more renovations such as his. Chair Majerus suggested tabling this issue for one month so that the HRA can review the criteria. The applicant was asked to find the appraisal done when the home was purchased in 2004. Member Kelsey asked if staff was to be given direction. (Yes) Motion: Chair Majerus moved, seconded by Member Kelsey, to table this application until the next meeting and direct staff to review criteria of the program, review the goals of the program, define median value of the property and homes in Roseville and then review the program against the Lindgren home at 3103 Asbury Bean stated that she wished to act on the proposal now, and then review the program criteria next month. The house is substandard, the lot is large. The proposal is helping a family with young kids which is an HRA goal. The home is in poor condition and undersized, the HRA should help ensure that the home is upgraded. Scheunemann suggested consistency, thinking through the request for the Lindgren’s, the HRA needs to abide by its program requirements. Director Bennett explained her logic in the review, including the house value shift from $105,000 to $45,000 and there must have been a reason for the assessment change which she felt was due to the recent purchase and understanding that the home was not is good condition. There was no vote taken on the motion. Motion: Member Millasovich moved, seconded by Member Bean, to approve the Lindgren application with an exception on criteria 1. Ayes: 3 Nays: 3 Motion failed. Motion: Chair Bean moved, seconded by Member Majerus, to review design program criteria at the next meeting. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Motion: Member Bean moved, seconded by Member Millasovich, to table the Lindgren application until the March meeting. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Alternatives and Recommendations for a City of Roseville Rental Licensing Ordinance b. (HF0036) Executive Director Bennett provided a summary regarding the public hearing held by the HRA at the January 17, 2006 meeting. In addition, Ms. Bennett provided a review of alternatives for the HRA consideration including: http://archive.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/hra/minutes/2006/hram060221.htm3/10/2008