Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville - Housing & Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes for May 17, 2005Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />Executive Director Bennett will coordinate distribution of the draft report to all parts of the community. <br /> <br />Member Hermes expressed concern about distribution of the document without further review by the RHRA first. <br />Member Kelsey suggested the RHRA review and add to the document over the next months with some <br />clarification and modification. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Scheunemann moved, seconded by Member Hermes, to accept the draft neighborhood <br />meeting report and findings prepared and presented by the Center for Policy, Planning and <br />Performance, with RHRA to review and modify, then report to the Chairs, City Council and come up with <br />marketing and action steps prior to the budgeting process. The final report will be forthcoming (in <br />months) with action steps. <br /> <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />b) Consider Request for CDBG Funds – 1045 Larpenteur Ave., Roseville Senior House (HF22). <br /> <br />Executive Director Cathy Bennett explained that the RHRA previously had reviewed the Roseville Senior <br />Housing handicap accessible door request in the fall of 2004 with no action. RHRA members indicated a desire <br />for staff to review other possible funds available for the project. The RHRA also expressed a need for the <br />ownership/management to provide a match of the total cost of the project <br /> <br />At the suggestion of the RHRA, staff requested that the management provide at least 50% of the cost of the <br />project. The management has indicated their ability to fund 50% of the cost of the accessible door system using <br />a portion of the 2005 maintenance budget if the RHRA provides the remaining 50% using its existing CDBG <br />funds. <br /> <br />The project includes 127 units of senior subsidized housing. The building was constructed in 1977 and is <br />financed by HUD funds which require that rents do not exceed limits for people with income at or below 50% of <br />median income. ($26,000 for one person). Although the building is well maintained it does not have handicap <br />accessible entry doors. This is becoming an increasing burden on the aging residents in the building. HUD does <br />not require that the doors be installed as a stipulation for their financing. In 2004, over 20 letters from residents <br />of this complex were collect asking that the RHRA support the request for funds. <br /> <br />Staff is suggesting that the RHRA reimburse Stanley Management for 50% of the total cost, up to a maximum of <br />$5,000, after the project is completed and fully paid. In addition, staff recommends that signed lien waivers be <br />collected to ensure that the contractors have been paid for their service and materials. <br /> <br />Member Kelsey asked where this fits in the budget (multifamily renovation). The Board discussed the bids for the <br />door installations and agreed that a cap, not to exceed 50% or $5,000, whichever is less, was acceptable. <br /> <br />Member Millasovich explained this is a good program to promote on behalf of the RHRA. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Millasovich moved, seconded by Member Bean, to approve the expenditure of 50% of <br />the total cost, not to exceed $5,000, paid from RHRA existing restricted CDBG funds, for installation of <br />handicap accessible entry doors at the Roseville Senior House Complex at 1045 Larpenteur Ave as a <br />reimbursement to Stanley Management upon completion of the project and collection of signed lien <br />waivers. <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried <br /> <br />c) Consider modifications to the Roseville Housing Redesign Program (HF6). <br /> <br />Chair Majerus introduced the topic and requested Executive Directory Bennett to summarize. <br /> <br />In November 2003, the RHRA modified the previously named Rambler Redesign Program to include additional <br />eligibility criteria which helps to ensure that the goals of the program are achieved. The intent of these changes <br />was to more accurately provide a method to attract and retain middle income families who want to move to or <br />stay in the community but desire a more modern home. Two applications have been approved since January of <br />2004 under the new program criteria. <br /> <br />However, based upon an average annual increase in value of Roseville homes of 8% over the past 5 years, staff <br />recommends modifying the required program eligibility for maximum assessed value by 8% annually. As this is a <br />http://archive.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/hra/minutes/2005/hram050215.htm3/12/2008 <br /> <br />