CC_Minutes_2008_0303 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, March 03, 2008 Page 9 Councilmember Pust recalled discussions that the disagreement was actually be- tween staff members on whether this was a new authority or not and whether an administrative warrant allowed access to the interior of the property with property owner consent, and intended notice of what an administrative warrant entailed. Councilmember Roe noted that, in the advisory group report, their intent was to have a statement or check-off area on the registration form, stating the City's au- thority, but opined that perhaps putting it in code was going a step too far. Lacking a clear consensus, City Attorney Squires was asked to provide clarifica- tion on inclusion of the language. Mayor Klausing noted the great work on providing definitions; however, noted that the term "unit" was not clearly defined and should be. Mayor Klausing fur- ther noted that, in staff's memo, lines 62 and 63, rentals to family members were excluded; however, noted that language should be clarified that if the rental were only to family members, as reflected in ordinance language, Section 907.06, that all renters were family members. Mayor Klausing suggested delaying action until the next meeting to allow staff and the City Attorney to incorporate and clarify language and tonight's discus- sion. Mayor Klausing asked that staff provide ared-lined copy excluding red- lining for areas that contained no issues. b. Receive Public Comments and Consider Adoption of a Social Hosting Ordi- nance Councilmember Pust, at the request of Mayor Klausing, reintroduced this pro- posed ordinance, noting that this was the third time the ordinance was brought forward for discussion. Councilmember Pust noted that the intent of the ordi- nance was to insure that youth in the community were provided safe and super- vised places to congregate; and noted the request from the last meeting for addi- tional public comment prior to adoption. Councilmember Pust noted that public information had been included in the weekly news update and the City's website, in addition the Roseville Issues Fo- rum. Councilmember Pust advised that in her discussions with Roseville citizens had indicated positive support, with only one resident of St. Paul questioning the need for such an ordinance. Mayor Klausing called for public comment, but no one in the audience appeared to speak for or against. Mayor Klausing noted one area of concern related to Section 509.05 regarding excepted situations when parents were present; with staff providing revised draft language accordingly, as a bench handout, with Section 509.05 proposed to be re-