CC_Minutes_2008_0421 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, Apri121, 2008 Page 19 Councilmember Pust opined that she didn't mind having the administrative fee process in the City's code enforcement tool box, she didn't want it to be a manda- tory step, and wanted staff to be able to use their discretion in how the process should proceed, if through administrative fine or abatement. Mayor Klausing opined that the ultimate goal was to have people in compliance, and if not for the situation to be remedied; and further opined that the administra- tive ticket process seemed less severe and less adversarial than the abatement process, and more likely to produce the overall goals of improving quality of life in the neighborhood. Discussion included staff's current process for notice and administrative ticketing; provisional language in the draft ordinance and discretion of staff through the process; problematic issues with repeat offenders, with the proposed administra- tive ticket process just prolonging the process; need to treat each case equally and uniformly by staff, without differentiation; internal versus external appeal proc- esses; and balancing the rights of individuals versus the rights of the community as a whole. Councilmember Ihlan opined that the City Manager, as the hearing officer, may not be impartial, and recommended an external hearing officer, even though that would delay the process. Public Comment John Kysylyczyn, 3083 N Victoria Street Mr. Kysylyczyn provided two bench handouts and commented that there seemed to be a lot of discussion on a minor situation and the process to remedy those lim- ited situations. Further discussion ensued among Councilmembers, staff, and City Attorney Squires on the process for administrative tickets. Councilmember Pust reiterated her position that, given the limited number of in- stances of non-payment of administrative tickets, staff should have the discretion to determine if an abatement or an administrative ticket was the best course to fol- low. Karen Schaffer Ms. Schaffer expressed her confusion in following the processes, opining that a judicial determination would be made based on whether the fine was paid or not, not whether the violation had been corrected or eradicated. Caroline Bell Beckman, Prosecuting Attorney's Office Ms. Bell Beckman spoke in support of the administrative ticket process from their office's perspective, noting that they had drafted the proposal, currently used by