CC_Minutes_2008_0421 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, April 21, 2008 Page 20 the Cities of White Bear Lake and North St. Paul, and under consideration for Vadnais Heights, their other client cities. Ms. Bell Beckman reviewed current City policy of Roseville, the proposed process; and their office's attempts to util- ize anadministrative offense calendar, rather than appear before a judge, to re- solve those more minor violations, and to eliminate additional court surcharges and assessments, and for the violators to avoid a civil or criminal record, with fines going directly to the City, through a more friendly process. Mark Goggins, Prosecuting Attorney's Office Mr. Goggins advised that the administrative offense calendar served as an alterna- tive dispute resolution process for misdemeanor ordinance violation issues, with the prosecutor representing the City and speaking directly to the violator to achieve resolution, rather than appearing before the judge. Mr. Goggins advised that the violator always had the right to resolve the issue at that point, or take it before a judge or jury trial for their day in court for due process. Councilmember Pust recognized that, as the City's prosecuting attorneys, they were in favor of the administrative ticket option for resolution at the city level, and commended them for their work with people in resolving issues in a timely manner. However, Councilmember Pust noted that by the time the case got to the prosecution stage, the City had already been attempting resolution for six months, and she didn't support another three to four month delay in the process. Ms. Bell Beckman recognized that the violations were a constant source of irrita- tion to neighbors, since they were also in communication with staff; and noted that in certain cases, the law needed to be laid down, but that people needed to be treated similarly based on equal protection issues. Ms. Bell Beckman, on an unrelated note, advised that they were advocating for the District Court to implement community court, as an alternative to DWI court, currently being driven by the City of St. Paul as an option for repeat violators; and sought City Council support to the bench to encourage implementation in District Court. Mr. Goggins opined that, given the number of serious cases being heard by dis- trict judges, even if the City took a case to court, it didn't ensure a favorable judgment, creating additional incentive to resolve the issues before they get that far through the administrative ticket process. Pust moved, Klausing seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1366 entitled, "An Ordinance Amending Title 1 (Administration), Section 102 (General Penalty) of Roseville City Code;" to require mandatory payment of Administrative Offense tickets and establish increased administrative penalty amounts for subsequent of- fenses within an 18 month period.