Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, Apri128, 2008 <br />Page 13 <br />periences in regulating a pawnshop, the number of police resources required, and <br />inability to recover all of the stolen merchandise. Mr. Park expressed concern that <br />the money was being turned around quickly to be used for drugs, and related con- <br />cerns that crime may increase in the community due to this business. <br />Mayor Klausing recognized receipt of Mr. Park's a-mail, and thanked him for the <br />time and work put into it. Mayor Klausing referenced the e-mail's allegations that <br />the merchandise was turned over quickly to provide money for drugs, but ques- <br />tioned how the stolen property and the holding period entered into that equation. <br />Mr. Park opined that the property was written off as a loss by area businesses and <br />costs were passed on to consumers; and questioned how many theft reports were <br />received by the Police Department from major department stores in Roseville, <br />unless they were large ticket items. Mr. Park further opined that it was obvious <br />that what other communities had done to change their regulations to consider im- <br />pacts and aggressive regulations on such businesses should serve as an example to <br />the City of Roseville, rather than the City remaining naive or thinking they were <br />immune to such problems. Mr. Park begged the City Council to think very hard <br />about their decision, or to delay a decision until they'd done further investigation, <br />noting the concerns being expressed by citizens, and whether this location was <br />appropriate for a pawnshop. <br />Margaret Cavanaugh, 1715 Eldridge <br />Ms. Cavanaugh referenced the objective criteria outlined in the staff report for <br />considering impacts, and impacts and effects on business and residential property <br />values. Information was based on a leading realtor for commercial properties sur- <br />rounding Rosedale; a study by a firm in Winnipeg, Canada, along with other stud- <br />ies, addressing curb appeal and personal perception and negative responses in <br />neighborhoods with a pawnshop; studies indicating that shoppers shun areas <br />where perceived unsavory business uses were indicated, specifically addressing <br />pawnshops; city planning based on quantitative and qualitative data, trends, and <br />indicators, based on perceived marginal retail activities (i.e., pawnshops and <br />fringe financial institutions). Ms. Cavanaugh opined that if the City Council <br />voted to approve this pawnshop that it would send a message that will change the <br />perception of their neighborhood and dramatically impact neighborhood property <br />values. Ms. Cavanaugh further opined that this vote was an opportunity for the <br />City Council to show the neighborhood that they care about area property values, <br />and asked that the City Council not be intimidated by the applicant's recent law- <br />suit against the City of Minneapolis until they were allowed to open a store in <br />Minneapolis. Ms. Cavanaugh offered further information from state and federal <br />court legislation on constitutionality; and offered to share the studies and informa- <br />tion with Councilmembers if they so wished. <br />Mayor Klausing, and Councilmembers, expressed their desire to receive and re- <br />view Ms. Cavanaugh's referenced studies. <br />