Laserfiche WebLink
Special Joint Meeting Roseville City Council <br />and the Roseville Area School Board, District No. 623 <br />Wednesday, June 25, 2008 <br />Page 7 <br />activities and gathering outside of school; and recognition of the only viable youth <br />space now available was that of R-2 at the Hamline Shopping Center operated <br />cooperatively by a coalition of local churches. <br />Councilmember Roe noted recent discussion with the redevelopment of the Rain- <br />bow Foods site, loss of the theater, and need for inexpensive activities for young <br />people. <br />Superintendent Thein noted that the School District walked a fine line in not <br />competing with for-profit organizations and businesses; with the School not going <br />into the business of showing movies for profit, other than on a periodic or limited <br />program basis. Superintendent Thein opined that the City/School partnership <br />needed to address and adjust to the next generation of youth needs. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that other organizations in the community (i.e., civic <br />and faith or non-profits) needed to be actively involved in a broader discussion <br />about their potential in providing underused facilities for overall community pro- <br />gramming needs. <br />Superintendent Thein opined the need to also consider kids in need, whose par- <br />ents couldn't afford many opportunities, and that needed to be worked into the <br />programming equation. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that discussion was needed on programmed uses as well as <br />non-programmed or safe places where kids could congregate, other than the <br />Rosedale Mall, and opined that City parks met some of those outdoor needs. <br />Superintendent Thein noted the wear and tear on some of the athletic fields (i.e., <br />football field) and the need to "rest" them in preparation for the upcoming com- <br />petitive season. <br />Considerable discussion involved potential use of artificial use, and cooperative <br />considerations by the District, City and various athletic associations within the <br />community and area, noting that while initially costly, long-term benefits were <br />savings in irrigation, lawnmower fuel, and transportation of mowers, in addition <br />to the cost of supplies in their maintenance. <br />Further discussion included various programs (i.e., gymnastics, swimming) and <br />the positive experiences and improved self-esteem for students through their par- <br />ticipation; and infrastructure costs and maintenance of facilities; open and pro- <br />grammed swim times at the Fairview facility. <br />Councilmember Roe suggested, with enthusiastic Board and City Council consen- <br />sus, that both bodies needed to determine a better inventory of existing facilities <br />