CC_Minutes_2008_0714 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, July 14, 2008 Page 12 lobbying groups to use existing footprint on the same location, while complying with current state and fire codes; noted Section 2.3 of the staff report for 2004 amendments to City Code for other than shoreland properties; vacancy provisions related to non-conformities; and implications of state law and City Code provi- sions; and language revisions suggested by Councilmember Roe and Mr. Trudg- eon. Pust moved, Roe seconded, approval of Ordinance No. 1370 entitled, "An Ordi- nance Amending Title 10 of the City Code, Specifically Sections 1002.02, 1005.07, 1012.02, 1012.03, 1012.04, and 1012.05 and pertaining to Non- conforming Structures and Uses;" shown as Attachment B, amended as follows: ^ Attachment B ^ Page 1, line 6, strike "Purpose" from the Section 1 title. ^ Page 1, line 17, replace "existing" with "current" to avoid redundancy and provide clarity of language ^ Page 2, Move lines 64 - 67 to after Item B.1, on lines 71 - 78 as #2, "Expan- sion of apre-existing non-conforming structure is permitted, if said expansion does not encroach further into the already established non-conforming set- back. Said expansion shall meet all other requirements of this Title." Roll Call Ayes: Roe; Pust; Willmus; Ihlan and Klausing. Nays: None. Pust moved, Klausing seconded, approval of Ordinance Summary No. 1370 enti- tled, "An Ordinance Summary for Amendments to Title 10 (Zoning Regulations) of the Roseville City Code," for official publication. Roll Call Ayes: Roe; Pust; Willmus; Ihlan and Klausing. Nays: None. c. Discussion of Leaf Collection Program Public Works Director Duane Schwartz provided background information and considerations for a City Council discussion to consider resources currently di- rected to the City's leaf collection program, and possible reallocation of those re- sources for unmet needs of meeting storm water regulations, aging infrastructure, and maintenance of boulevard trees and streetscapes. This information was de- tailed in the staff report dated July 14, 2008; and staff recommended no change in current operation of the Leaf Recycling Center. Mr. Schwartz presented the various considerations of the program as follows: