My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2008_0811
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
CC_Minutes_2008_0811
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2008 3:18:45 PM
Creation date
8/25/2008 3:18:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/11/2008
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 11, 2008 <br />Page 16 <br />City Manager Malinen noted that Public Safety levies were an exception to the <br />State's 3.9% levy limit; and that the proposed levy did not include the levy of <br />$355,000 for the Ice Arena refrigeration system, nor the Housing and Redevel- <br />opment Authority levy, yet to be determined. <br />City Manager Malinen advised that time would be allotted at the next City Coun- <br />cil meeting for the City Council to discuss the budget in more detail after they had <br />a chance to absorb the budget, and after receipt of any requests to staff for addi- <br />tional budget information. <br />City Manager Malinen noted the presentation of the 10-year Capital Improvement <br />Plan (CIP) with more detail as staff's response to the City Council's previous re- <br />quest for more detail and in context with overall budget information. <br />Councilmember Pust sought clarification on 2008 and 2009 CIP comparisons. <br />Councilmember Pust sought clarification on whether of the CII' items had been <br />built into the 2009 recommended budget funding, and if so, how the City Council <br />could decipher those specific items. <br />Finance Director Miller advised that the 2009 CIP attempted to show a more real- <br />istic picture of what was needed; and that 2009 would have shown a big jump <br />compared to 2008. Mr. Miller advised that staff would provide Councilmembers <br />electronic with that specific detail to identify CIP items built into the 2009 rec- <br />ommended budget funding. <br />Councilmember Roe sought clarification on the 2008 asset replacement and re- <br />serve fund improvements, and their application if one-time, or if intended for <br />2009; and if funds were being dedicated annually to reach financial policy goals. <br />Councilmember Roe questioned whether the 2009 amount for both of those areas <br />had been reduced on the capital side. <br />Finance Director Miller confirmed Councilmember Roe's observations. <br />Mayor Klausing opined that the policy goal remained the same, but due to levy <br />constraints and lack of additional revenue sources, the City remained further out <br />in realizing their goal in the next few budget cycles. <br />Finance Director Miller concurred; but encouraged the City Council not to waiver <br />from their target objective, but to recognize that it would take longer to achieve. <br />Councilmember Pust sought clarification as to whether the reserve funds were re- <br />duced by a standard percentage across the board or if they varied. <br />Finance Director Miller advised that the percentages would vary, based on prior- <br />ity needs (i.e., rolling stock and equipment age and condition); with other oppor- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.