My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2008_0922
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
CC_Minutes_2008_0922
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2008 12:00:07 PM
Creation date
10/28/2008 12:00:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/22/2008
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 22, 2008 <br />Page 15 <br />Councilmember Willmus opined that this was a difficult decision for him to <br />make; however, noted that he definitely had trouble supporting the requested <br />twenty (20) year term; and anything less than 1-1/2% administrative fees. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that she was willing to support creation of an HIA, <br />but would like further Council discussion and consideration of the internal as- <br />sessment allocations; further opining that this was an appropriate role for the City <br />Council, similar to other assessments they approved. <br />Assessment <br />Mayor Klausingleda discussion on the assessment allocation; recognizing that the <br />Association had been through the allocation many times; however, noted that if <br />the Association put themselves in the City Council's position, as representatives <br />of the entire community, they would note the need for their due diligence of the <br />matter. <br />Ms. Kelsey noted that the City Council had received, in their packets, a summary <br />of the specifications and the letter from Load Bearing describing the scope of <br />work. <br />Mayor Klausing opined that he needed additional time to review the materials and <br />reconcile stated policy with the assessment allocations. <br />Councilmember Roe opined that he was ready to move forward with the ordi- <br />nance, noting that it provided an additional step prior to imposing the fee, with <br />provisions for paying upfront or via assessments, following another public hear- <br />ing to adopt a resolution related to establishing a fee and the process to be fol- <br />lowed. Councilmember Roe observed that, if necessary, the ordinance language <br />could be amended at the time the resolution assessing fees was adopted; recogniz- <br />ing that the Association may have come up with more options by then. <br />Mayor Klausing expressed his interest in having all questions and issues ad- <br />dressed at this time, prior to proceeding with the ordinance establishing and HIA. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that, if she was the contractor still honoring his bid, <br />and with rising fuel costs, if he didn't see some forward momentum, he was going <br />to remove his bid. Councilmember Pust questioned how the City Council could <br />substitute their judgment for that of a group of property owners. Councilmember <br />Pust opined that the ordinance move forward, noting City Attorney Squires read- <br />ing of State Statute provisions, otherwise the entire project would fall apart due to <br />inaction or further delay. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that he was not suggesting that the City Council rework the <br />documents, expressing his respect for the work done; however, he wanted to make <br />sure he understood all of the provisions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.