Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 22, 2008 <br />Page 9 <br />Ms. Dalens quotes State Statute and provided her interpretation of the language. <br />Ms. Dalens spoke to the demographics of the six (6) smaller units; and asked that <br />the City Council not approve the request as presented at this time. Ms. Dalens <br />took issue with not receiving requested information from the Association Board; <br />and the specifications provided by Load Bearing as far as footages and equal divi- <br />sions of costs. Ms. Dalens shared personal calculations of proposed cost alloca- <br />tions for the project; and reviewed designated common property areas. <br />John Shea, 2642 MacKubin Street <br />Mr. Shea opined that the membership had already voted and approved the divi- <br />sion of costs; and noted that the Association was present only to seek the City <br />Council's support of the HIA; and that the allocation was not longer pertinent to <br />the discussion with adoption by the majority of the Second Declaration document. <br />Mayor Klausing clarified that the City Council was charged with and obligated to <br />perform due diligence in making an assessment, and in using public monies. <br />Norman Peterson, 2678 MacKubin Street <br />Mr. Peterson advised that his is a large unit, and opined that he did not have a <br />"porch" as indicated by Ms. Dalens. Mr. Peterson observed that each unit had <br />different features, and each were unique; and asked that the City Council take that <br />into consideration and approved the ordinance. <br />Tom Lind, 2726 MacKubin <br />Mr. Lind clarified what the Board had attempted in making fair cost allocations to <br />all units, and noted the common improvement areas for the overall project, includ- <br />ing roofing, divider walls, garages, and common areas. Mr. Lind noted that the <br />original cedar siding had continued to deteriorate and attract rodents, causing fur- <br />ther deterioration, and that the Board's rationale was to alleviate and correct that <br />in the fairest way possible for all residents, in addition to making the building <br />more energy efficient. Mr. Lind opined that the difference in costs per unit was <br />minimal when broken down into the five categories for the project. Mr. Lind fur- <br />ther clarified that the purpose of this Public Hearing was to determine if the City <br />was going to loan money for the project or not; and noted the amount of work <br />completed to-date by the Board, and the status of the bids and time constraints, in <br />addition to the original bids having expired in August, and the increase in shingle <br />costs. Mr. Lind opined that the longer the approval process was delayed, the <br />more cost unknowns and material and supply costs would increase. <br />Ron Brand, smaller unit owners, 2710 MacKubin Street <br />Mr. Brand advised that, while not currently living on site, he and his wife had <br />purchased the unit for their retirement residence. Mr. Brand opined that it was vi- <br />tally important that this financing become available; and that a consensus on that <br />financial assistance happen and the project be completed for the overall benefit of <br />Westwood Village. Mr. Brand opined that this was a challenge, since all the units <br />