My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2008_1020
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
CC_Minutes_2008_1020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2008 2:00:54 PM
Creation date
10/30/2008 2:00:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/20/2008
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, October 20, 2008 <br />Page 7 <br />Councilmember Willmus opined that the City Council should lead by example, <br />given other employee contract negotiations. <br />Mayor Klausing recognized Councilmember Willmus' intent; however, noted that <br />the City Council had not increased the compensation, discussion had not been <br />held, to his recollection, on reducing the compensation; and asked that staff pro- <br />vide budget impacts if a potential ten percent (10%) reduction were considered, <br />and the cost savings, estimated to be a decrease of approximately $3,800 - $4,000. <br />Councilmember Ihlan requested an additional item for staff to provide informa- <br />tion on potential reductions for Ethics Commission training; and while not advo- <br />cating for eliminating their budget, whether there was a potential cost savings in <br />that budget. <br />Mayor Klausing, in reviewing Councilmember Roe's discussion points, requested <br />that staff provide additional information and/or comments related to budgetary <br />and program impacts for any and all of those items (i.e., impacts for not seeking <br />re-accreditation for parks). <br />Councilmember Pust advised that she had submitted her questions to staff and <br />was awaiting their response, at which time she would circulate her comments and <br />staff responses to the full Council. Councilmember Pust noted that her comments <br />and questions were basically related to quantifying anticipated fuel and utility in- <br />creases; abreakdown of the proposed $65,000 increase for dispatch services; and <br />a breakdown on staff compensation and benefit increases and their percentage of <br />the overall budget. <br />Councilmember Pust noted that preliminary approval for the HarMar Apartment <br />project, and the $100,000 set aside in the Housing & Redevelopment Authority <br />(HRA) budget for this purpose, was pending. <br />Councilmember Roe clarified his last discussion point (Item #6) and his intent in <br />not suggesting that any potential sale of Fire Station #2 on Fairview Avenue be <br />used for ongoing operating expenses, but that those revenues or a portion of them <br />go toward capital costs or dealing with fund balances. <br />b. Discuss Legal Services Contract for City Prosecutor and City Attorney <br />City Manager Malinen reviewed his recommendation, as detailed in the Request <br />for Council Action dated October 20, 2008, for appointment and authorization to <br />negotiate contracts fro City Attorney and City Prosecuting Attorney. <br />Mr. Malinen advised that the City had submitted Requests for Qualifications <br />(RFQ's) through the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) website, in addition to <br />mainlining out 44 RFQ's. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.