My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2008_1027
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
CC_Minutes_2008_1027
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2008 1:40:14 PM
Creation date
11/14/2008 1:40:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/27/2008
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, October 27, 2008 <br />Page 10 <br />further opined that she was concerned about the apparent arbitrary and capri- <br />ciousness of deferral consideration due to the property owners' age and costs to <br />them, when it was obvious that the homeowners had chosen not to complete the <br />sewer service in the first place to their benefit, and now being faced with current <br />conditions in evidence based on that original decision. Councilmember Pust <br />spoke in support of a consistent application or treatment, justified on established <br />criteria, not based on your age or health. Councilmember Pust noted that other <br />property owners were not provided additional public benefit based on their indi- <br />vidual circumstances; and suggested a standardized system for such determina- <br />tions. <br />Further discussion included staff s analysis of why the Housing Resource Center <br />was unable to assist the property owner in this instance due to their lack of com- <br />pletion of the process. <br />Mayor Klausing clarified the two issues before the City Council: whether to com- <br />plete the abatement, given the property's proximity to the lake; and further dis- <br />cussion on consistency of compliance issues. <br />Councilmember Pust spoke in support of the abatement, but not of a deferment for <br />this individual case unless applied to similarly-situated residents. <br />Councilmember Ihlan sought clarification of the interest rate to be determined; <br />and whether the City's discounted utility payments for senior citizens were means <br />tested. <br />Finance Director Miller advised that the City's interest rate for public improve- <br />ment projects was typically 1-1/2% above what the City could earn on their in- <br />vestment portfolio, since the City was losing interest; and today would be ap- <br />proximately 6%. Councilmember Miller advised that discounted utility payments <br />for senior citizens were not means tested; however, noted that if owners were on a <br />fixed income, you were on an "honor system," and asked to sign an affidavit; and <br />for others receiving a discount, they were asked to demonstrate an income means <br />test based on federal poverty levels. <br />Councilmember Roe sought clarification, confirmed by Mr. Miller, that any items <br />assessed to taxes, would come before the City Council at year-end prior to being <br />certified to Ramsey County. <br />Councilmember Roe spoke in support of review of the financial aspects at a later <br />date. <br />Klausing moved, Pust seconded, directing staff to abate public nuisance violation <br />at 411 Owasso Boulevard S by hiring a general contractor to repair or replace <br />sewage holding tank, as detailed in the Request for Council Action dated October <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.