My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_020608
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
pm_020608
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2008 2:40:54 PM
Creation date
11/17/2008 2:40:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/6/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, February 06, 2008 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Commissioner Wozniak noted that he didn’t see anything in the preliminary plans to <br />accommodate mass transit use by employees using the corporate campus, or <br />alternative transit opportunities, and asked McGough to consider those options. <br />Commissioner Gottfried concurred with Commissioner Wozniak's mass transit <br />observations and his request to McGough. Commissioner Gottfried also observed the <br />need for McGough to consider traffic flow and access in their design principles, with <br />bringing things closer to the street to make them more pedestrian friendly; and spoke <br />in opposition to the large parking lot in front of the building as proposed on the <br />concept plans, opining that such a positioning of the buildings and their configuration <br />did not enhance pedestrian friendly parking or access. Commissioner Gottfried <br />suggested that, given today’s and future projected fuel costs, McGough consider <br />reviewing the proposed parking structures, their projected use over a 30-40 year <br />span, and how to incorporate discussion of Twin Lakes Parkview in those projections <br />and related to connectivity and pedestrian friendly uses. <br />c. PLANNING FILE 08-005 <br />Request by Roundy’s Supermarkets, Inc. for approval of a REZONING AND <br />GENERAL CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT to redevelop the Rainbow <br />Foods store on the property at 1201 – 1215 Larpenteur Avenue <br />Chair Bakeman opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 08-005. <br />Mr. Paschke reviewed the request of Roundy’s for REZONING, and GENERAL <br />CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT to redevelop 1201 – 1211, and 1215 <br />Larpenteur Avenue into a 60,000 plus square foot Rainbow grocery store, open <br />market and small café/coffee restaurant/structure. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that Roundy’s desired to redevelop the 7.7 acre mixed <br />commercial property at 1201 – 1211, and 1215 Larpenteur Avenue into a 60,000 plus <br />square foot Rainbow Foods grocery store that would ultimately include a drive-thru <br />pharmacy, an open market structure (on the southwest corner), and a small <br />coffee/café type structure/use (on the southeast corner). Mr. Paschke further advised <br />that the site includes three (3) parcels of land: two (2) owned by the Reinhart Real <br />Estate Group, Inc., and one owned by the City of Roseville (lift station location). Mr. <br />Paschke noted that the proposal sought to raze the existing grocery store, former craft <br />store and Roseville 4 Theater and replace them with a new Rainbow Foods store. The <br />proposal also sought to raze the former Little Caesar’s Pizza Store in the southwest <br />corner of the site, replacing it with a storm water management pond and open market, <br />and creation of an additional café/coffee shop use in the southeast corner of the <br />subject parcel that could support a drive-thru. <br />Mr. Paschke noted the extreme topography of the lot with the parcel currently rising <br />approximately sixteen feet (16’) from south to north and creating difficult navigation <br />due to this slope. Mr. Paschke noted that one of the benefits of the proposal was in <br />designing a gentler slope by lowering the north and south portions of the parcel by an <br />approximate three feet (3’), with a retaining wall designed at the rear of the parcel to <br />account for this flattening. <br />Mr. Paschke noted that both landscaping, based on conformity to the Larpenteur <br />Avenue Streetscape Master Plan, and dramatic storm water management, based on <br />current engineering standards, would be greatly improved. Mr. Paschke noted that <br />this parcel was part of the Gottfried Pit Subwatershed District, a major problem area in <br />the City’s storm water management system. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that staff was in general support of the proposal, given some <br />pre-existing site difficulties as addressed in the staff report. Mr. Paschke further noted <br />that the PUD process allowed for some flexibility for mitigation and negotiation. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.