Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, June 04, 2008 <br />Page 3 <br />Goal 4: Discussion included the need to promote best practices (Section 4.2 and 4.3) <br />with the City actually serving as a model of environmental best practices for natural <br />AND manmade eco-systems; including language about exploring mixed use in <br />existing residential neighborhoods (i.e., neighborhood grocery stores) to revert back to <br />pre-automobile development cultures, similar to that addressed in Goal 5 <br />(neighborhood business areas). <br />Ms. Radel noted that without the full chapter and context for future land use maps and <br />categories, it was difficult for the Commission to be aware of the provisions included, <br />such as the neighborhood business nodes and categories already in place at <br />intersections with County roads, and including walking and bike connections, and <br />whether additional locations were suggested. <br />Further discussion included the need to include policies pertaining to public lands to <br />ensure that the City as a landowner is held responsible for public property in the city, <br />with policies where the City demonstrated leadership for sustainable design; <br />alternative energy sources and efficiencies in those systems; native landscaping for <br />lower maintenance at all City-owned facilities; and leadership by the City in the role of <br />best management practices for current public lands in terms of plantings, <br />maintenance (i.e., buckthorn removal, organic weed control, less mowing); and <br />possible public/private cooperative ventures and entities to maintain and/or promote <br />acquisition and use of open space in the City (i.e., Central Park). <br />Ms. Radel advised that she would bring the Commissioner’s suggestions forward to <br />the Steering Committee and integrate those comments into those discussions. <br />Commissioners concurred with Commissioner Martinson’s suggestion that the City be <br />a role model for accessibility to ensure that pedestrian-oriented (walking, biking, and <br />handicapped accessibility) be provided on existing roadways, but for future <br />infrastructure construction as well. <br />Commissioner Doherty requested that staff use tonight’s Agenda Item 6.c (PF08-017) <br />as a discussion point for the Steering Committee to see how it fit with neighborhood <br />development discussions. <br />Chair Bakeman continued the Public Hearing, with no one appearing to speak. <br />Ms. Radel reminded the public of the ongoing Steering Committee meetings held on <br />periodic Thursday evenings in the Public Works Building Conference Room, and <br />invited comment and/or attendance, with updated information available on the City’s <br />website. <br />MOTION <br />Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Doherty to CONTINUE Project <br />File 0004 to the July 2008 meeting. <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />b. PLANNING FILE 08-019 <br />Request by Richard and Maureen Cox, 2045 Loren Road, for a Minor <br />Subdivision and VARIANCE to Roseville City Code Section 1103 (Design <br />Standards) to divide their residential lot and allow side property lines that are <br />not radial to the circular turnaround at the end of the adjacent cul-de-sac street <br />Chair Bakeman opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 08-019; and reviewed the <br />Public Hearing process. <br />Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd reviewed staff’s analysis of the request to allow the <br />recombination of two (2) contiguous lots of record so that the common property line <br />would no longer be radial to the adjacent circular turnaround. Mr. Lloyd noted that the <br /> <br />