Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, August 06, 2008 <br />Mr. Lloyd advised that the subject tenant space lies next to “Play It Again Sports” in an <br />existing retail building, and City Code, Section 1005.015 (Business District Uses) allows <br />motor vehicle sales in this location with an approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP). <br />Mr. Lloyd noted that during staff review of the application, the only concerns were raised <br />by the Fire Marshal who indicated that fire safety regulations restricted the amount of <br />flammable liquids that could be stored in a space like a sales floor, and in this case, the <br />combined amount of fuel in all of the motor vehicles and in any gas cans could not <br />exceed ten (10) gallons, as addressed as a recommended condition of approval. <br />Staff recommended APPROVAL of a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT request of Roseville <br />Properties and Allen Lenz (d/b/a Scooter Central) allowing the proposed motor vehicle <br />dealership at 2575 Fairview Avenue; based on the comments and findings of Sections 5 <br />and 6, and the conditions of Section 7 of the project report dated August 6, 2008. <br />Discussion among staff and commissioners included City Code definition of “major” and <br />“minor” auto-related repairs and maintenance and the land use application and CUP <br />evaluation not considered for regulation as part of this application, but based on uses <br />allowed in a B-3 Zoning District. <br />Chair Bakeman noted that the applicant was not present. <br />Chair Bakeman closed the Public Hearing, with no one appearing to speak. <br />MOTION <br />Member Gottfried moved, seconded by Member Doherty to RECOMMEND <br />APPROVAL of a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT request of Roseville Properties and <br />Allen Lenz (d/b/a Scooter Central) allowing the proposed motor vehicle dealership <br />at 2575 Fairview Avenue; based on the comments and findings of Sections 5 and 6, <br />and the conditions of Section 7 of the project report dated August 6, 2008. <br />Further discussion included whether potential buyers were allowed to test drive the <br />vehicles, the location of such test drives, specific licensing required by State law for <br />operation of such vehicles, and available training classes for their operation. <br />Staff advised that State Statute, depending on the type of motorcycle or motor vehicle, <br />required a motorcycle endorsement and/or valid driver’s license. Staff further advised that <br />test driving was included in the traffic analysis and that related traffic would no have <br />significant impacts on public safety. <br />Commissioners concurred that the applicant be strongly encouraged to keep any test <br />drives off residential streets and only on main arterial roads, in order to be a “good <br />neighbor” to residential areas. Commissioners expressed concern that the applicant <br />provide test drives in a safe and appropriate manner, taking into consideration traffic <br />peaks, and to be respectful of residents (i.e., Rose Place) while making sure their <br />inexperience in this new operation didn’t create safety issues for the area streets, or for <br />those patrons test driving their vehicles. <br />Further discussion included street access and operation of Neighborhood Electric <br />Vehicles (NEVs) on City streets, with staff advising that the City of Roseville’s Police <br />Department had indicated that NEVs and other vehicles designed to go up to 25 miles <br />per hour (mph) may be operated on streets that are marked for maximum speeds of 35 <br />mph, unless signed otherwise. <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Chair Bakeman noted that this case was scheduled to be heard by the City Council at <br />their August 25, 2008 meeting. <br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br />