My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_100108
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2008
>
pm_100108
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2008 2:47:53 PM
Creation date
11/17/2008 2:47:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/1/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, October 01, 2008 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br />Mr. Goedeke spoke in support of limiting footprints to 100,000 square feet; opining that <br />due to land shortages in Roseville, the future was to build up. <br />Rick Poeschl, 1602 N Ridgewood Lane (across street from HarMar for 38 years) <br />Mr. Poeschl concurred with comments of Ms. Schaffer; speaking in opposition to <br />“Regional Business” designation in the HarMar and Target areas. Mr. Poeschl spoke to <br />the increasing traffic and congestion through his many years as a resident in that area. <br />Mr. Poeschl, on an unrelated note, concurred with Commissioner Boerigter and his <br />position in opposition to a parking ramp in Roseville. <br />David Boss, 1985 Snelling N <br />Mr. Boss expressed concern if HarMar were to expand further, noting the current <br />stacking of vehicles on Snelling in that area, even with recent street improvements; and <br />issues with the configuration of that intersection and traffic flow into and from the fast <br />food establishments. Mr. Boss opined that the more you develop, the more residents get <br />pushed out. <br />Tam McGehee, 77 Mid Oaks Lane <br />Ms. McGehee concurred with the comments and position addressed by Ms. Schaffer; <br />opining that a 100,000 square foot footprint limit did not preclude building up; further <br />opining that smaller businesses (i.e., Byerly’s, the new Rainbow, and Barns & Noble) <br />served the community, as well as the region; noting that the new owners at HarMar had <br />forced out many smaller businesses in the community, and further opined that people <br />liked the smaller formats. <br />Ms. McGehee opined that when she attended the first Open House, she was impressed <br />with the definition for “Community Business;” however, advised that she could not <br />support the current language; and questioned the process and this changed outcome. <br />Ms. McGehee noted her involvement in the Friends of Twin Lakes lawsuit; clarifying that <br />it had been based on the AUAR, not the Comprehensive Plan, nor the Twin Lakes Master <br />Plan. Ms. McGehee suggested another compromise in defining the dollar figure for staff <br />and consultant time in creating a Master Plan at $50,000 of public monies. Ms. McGehee <br />questioned the integrity of a simple majority vote for Master Plans. <br />Linda Pribyl, 1637 Ridgewood <br />Ms. Pribyl expressed concern, in considering “Regional Business” designations that they <br />be attractive and more upscale. Ms. Pribyl opined that homeowners pay taxes; as well <br />as commercial properties, and opined that the current commercial opportunities were <br />sufficient; however if further businesses were considered, or if HarMar were to be razed, <br />that the City consider a model similar to the City of Edina. <br />Ms. Pribyl opined that the “white wall” put up by MnDOT was offensive, in addition to the <br />new roadway being extremely rough. <br />Ann Berry, 1059 Woodhill Drive <br />Ms. Berry, as a 46 year resident in her home, reviewed the enormous changes in <br />Roseville during that time, and invoked the name of former City Planner Howard <br />Dahlgren and his years of devotion to the City and the common good through his good <br />design and respect for all people in the planning process. Ms. Berry noted that she had <br />served with Mr. Dahlgren when she was on the Planning Commission and when Twin <br />Lakes Parkway was first proposed, opining that it was an appropriate beginning for <br />development in that area. Ms. Berry reiterated that part of Mr. Dahlgren’s value to the <br />City was his respect for all people in the process; and Ms. Berry encouraged everyone to <br />keep his model in mind. <br />Ms. Berry urged the Steering Committee, the Planning Commission and City Council to <br />view the Comprehensive Plan as a guide to future development in the City; and to guard <br />against including numerous specificities (i.e., Master Plans) to allow details to change as <br />land develops. Ms. Berry opined that the Comprehensive Plan was a guide and should <br />be viewed that way, without specifically defining types or sizes for retail or the amount or <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.