Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 24, 2008 <br />Page 19 <br />Councilmember Ihlan advised that she was not willing to cut staff unless <br />staff so advised that it was necessary; but opined that everything was on <br />the table. <br />Councilmember Roe clarified that the state legislature maximum levy was <br />3.9%, rather than the 3.5% Councilmember Ihlan had indicated. Council- <br />member Roe noted the exceptions provided to municipalities by the state <br />legislature; and opined that it would be irresponsible for the City not to <br />look at those exceptions and take advantage of them, avoiding placing the <br />City in a more difficult situation to manage. <br />Councilmember Pust, in response to public comments made by Mr. Ky- <br />sylyczyn, noted that the reason the City Council struggled with percent- <br />ages was because they were an employer with over 80% of their costs <br />were personnel driven. Councilmember Pust noted that, as with any busi- <br />ness in the state, an employer couldn't keep their business operating at <br />3.5% when health care and other fixed costs were over 3%. Councilmem- <br />ber Pust opined that, with all due respect to Councilmember Ihlan, there <br />was no way to achieve a 3.9% levy without going through the exercise and <br />discussion, with a result in cutting staff. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that, if the Council majority hadn't already <br />built a tax increase into the budget with the sale of equipment bonds, other <br />costs could be accommodated. Councilmember Ihlan expressed concern <br />with the legal services discussion and potential for reducing costs through <br />other actions; and spoke in opposition to cutting jobs, when other sacri- <br />fices should be identified and recommended by staff. <br />Councihnember Roe provided an update on his recommendation at the <br />previous meeting, and subsequent discussions with staff and the City's <br />bond counsel regarding early decertification of Tax Increment (TIF) Dis- <br />trict No. 1; and the determination that there would no benefit in such ac- <br />tion. <br />At the prompting of Councilmember Roe, City Manager Malinen provided <br />additional information on potential funding from TIF District No. 1 to the <br />City in 2010 that could provide additional information in respect to the <br />2009 budget. <br />Mayor Klausing concurred with Councilmember Pust's comments related <br />to personnel costs and past fuel cost excesses, and the resulting inadequate <br />funding in 2008, in addition to a series of years when asset replacement <br />and capital improvements were deferred, resulting in a time of "catch up" <br />in current and future budgets, resulting in increases at a rate greater than <br />the rate of inflation. <br />