Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, December 15, 2008 <br />Page 26 <br />Councilmember Ihlan advised that her other suggestions for further reductions <br />were all related to personnel, including reducing cost of living adjustments <br />(COLA) for non-union employees; temporary suspension of step increases for <br />non-union employees; phasing of COLA increases over the year; and the need to <br />recognize that the City couldn't afford raises in 2009. Councilmember Ihlan <br />opined that this appeared to be the only other area for reduction if the reduction in <br />equipment and vehicles was not supported by Councilmembers. <br />Councilmember Ihlan further opined, related to the H1ZA Budget, that there <br />should be a zero levy increase for the HRA as well, allowing them to work on <br />their cash reserve carryover of $257,000. <br />Further discussion included the percentage of difference to the average home- <br />owner in a 3.4% versus 0% levy increase and staff's estimate of approximately <br />$.SO per month depending on home valuations, or an estimated savings of roughly <br />$45 annual from the staff-recommended budget as reduced. <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that such estimates were impossible to determine <br />due to valuation disparities for homeowners. Councilmember Ihlan further <br />opined that the City Council should do their best to not increase the levy; and ap- <br />pealed to her fellow Councilmembers to attempt this not unreasonable effort; <br />opining that it would mean so much to those who were really struggling, and that <br />it was the City Council's responsibility since they were spending other people's <br />money. Mayor Klausing noted that, while the City Council could absolutely <br />achieve a zero percent levy, opined that since they were indeed spending other <br />people's money, the City Council needed to do what was best for the long-term <br />viability and health of the community; opining that the City Council would not be <br />doing their duty for taxpayers to not position them in the long-term to replace ve- <br />hicles and maintain core services. Mayor Klausing opined that he was comfort- <br />able with and suggested moving the resolution ^to adopt the final tax levy as rec- <br />ommended by staff. <br />Councilmember Willmus sought clarification from Mr. Miller regarding impacts <br />of utilizing reserve funds for vehicle and equipment purchases. <br />Councilmember Pust noted the difficulty in how the budgets were presented and <br />individual abilities to clearly understand specific budget reserves. Councilmem- <br />ber Pust opined that the economy was only going to get worse, and the City <br />Council may need to rely on those reserves in 2010, rather than planned replace- <br />ment based on a schedule. <br />Mayor Klausing clarified that the reserves were not contingency funds for unex- <br />pected events, but served as part of the normal budgeting process. <br />