Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, December 15, 2008 <br />Page 25 <br />prior to tonight's meeting, staff could have been more responsive to potential im- <br />pacts. <br />Councilmember Pust suggested tabling this motion until the City Council had <br />time to consider other options, rather than this motion's success or failure simply <br />due to it being brought up first. <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed her willingness to defer a vote on the motion un- <br />til further discussion of her other suggestions. <br />Mayor Klausing noted that, from a procedural standpoint, the City Council had <br />previously identified targets for staff, as the City Council didn't feel comfortable <br />going through the budget line by line; and had directed staff to provide the City <br />Council with their expertise and judgment to achieve the City Council's target. <br />Mayor Klausing advised that staff had met that target with their recommendations <br />as detailed in the staff report; and sought clarification on the City Council's ap- <br />parent new goal. <br />Councilmember Ihlan advised that her goal had always been for a zero percent <br />levy increase; thus her proposal and optimism that it could now be achieved, <br />given the additional work provided by staff in reducing their recommended levy. <br />Councilmember Roe advised that he was not considering other areas; and noted <br />that while the City's vehicle replacement funding was in a better position, the <br />building and maintenance replacement fund was much further behind. Council- <br />member Roe advised that, as an example, he would be willing to look at reducing <br />the Fire Department fleet in future proposals; however, noted that he was unwill- <br />ing to not set aside funds for future capital purchases as that served as the kind of <br />strategic area that needed consideration for future impacts. <br />Additional discussion included clarification of proposed actions on future pur- <br />chase and depletion of the reserve funds; variables in expenditures depending on <br />needs, priorities and impacts; rationale in staff development and City Council ap- <br />proval of a ten (10) year capital improvement plan; and advantages in planning <br />budgeting for outcomes processes to identify priorities and impacts in future <br />years. <br />Councilmember Pust noted that, in all fairness for the record, while this budgeting <br />process was not clear-cut, it was partly due to the economy crashing in September <br />following the certification of the Preliminary Levy, rather than any due diligence <br />of staff. Councilmember Pust opined that she was pleased with staff's recom- <br />mendations, and the further reductions; and still supported the geothermal im- <br />provements made; however she recognized events following the economic down- <br />turn, in addition to impacts of levies by Ramsey County and the School District. <br />