My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_0207S
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_0207S
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2009 12:42:49 PM
Creation date
3/3/2009 12:42:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/7/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special City Council Strategic Planning Meeting <br />Saturday, February 7, 2009 <br />Page 14 <br />Mr. Trudgeon provided several examples: <br />^ The CDD partnership with the Police Department in code enforcement to coordinate <br />and communicate effectively in dealing with consistent problem ,properties; and the <br />great strides achieved over the last year. <br />^ The Cod's close work with the Fire Marshal for plan and application review and <br />comment <br />^ Intangibles of staff not having those resources readily available, causing sloppy plan <br />review, with some impacts already being felt by the department <br />^ The difficulties on the CDD, based on General Fund tax dollars created from <br />unsustainable market conditions and development as the economic market swung; <br />making it more difficult for the CDD to count on that interdepartmental cooperation <br />and coordination, and greatly impacting the reputation and work product of the CDD. <br />Anticipated MVHC-Specific Reduction = $ 0 - (fee supported) <br />Mr. Trudgeon opined that the CDD had been fortunate that 2008 was a good year, even <br />with the current economic climate, with it being the best revenue-producing year since <br />2003 for building permits. However, Mr. Trudgeon anticipated that 2009 would be more <br />challenging. Mr. Trudgeon advised that, the CDD may need to look at continuing to fund <br />services that don't bring in revenue, such as Code Enforcement requiring a lot of time <br />and minimal revenue; and while it is a high priority in the community, may need <br />revisited. <br />Mr. Trudgeon addressed Economic Development activities and whether that function <br />would need to be reduced or eliminated; or whether a better source of revenue projects <br />needed to be supported that would not be so subject to market fluctuations, and thus not <br />allowing the City to realize long-term gains in the community (i.e., jobs and community <br />development). <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that CDD staff was continually trying to identify revenue sources, <br />with recent escrow fees being charged to developers. <br />Mr. Trudgeon concluded by noting that even though the department may not be impacted <br />financially on adollar-for-dollar basis, the CDD felt the changes and challenges and <br />realities from other departments that would ultimately impact the CDD quality and level <br />of service for the work they produced. <br />City Manager Bill Malinen/Administration <br />City Manager Malinen advised that the Administration functions included elections, <br />legal, City Council, Human Rights Commission, and Ethics Commission. <br />Mr. Malinen advised that, for the 2009 Budget year, the Administration Department had <br />made reductions similar to other departments: reductions in the city-wide training budget; <br />reductions in staff receiving career development education and advance training; reduced <br />advertising; reduced professional service options. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.