My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_0207S
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_0207S
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2009 12:42:49 PM
Creation date
3/3/2009 12:42:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/7/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special City Council Strategic Planning Meeting <br />Saturday, February 7, 2009 <br />Page 4 <br />overtime so they can complete work in a timely manner or during off-time, allowing the <br />equipment to be up and running by shift time the following day. <br />Street Division <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that staff had recently had the bid opening for the 2009 <br />maintenance materials, and anticipated presenting them and staffls recommendation to <br />the City Council at their February 23, 2009 meeting. Mr. Schwartz advised that the bids <br />had been disappointing, but comparable to the experiences of other communities, having <br />not come down from previous levels. Mr. Schwartz noted that when the City had bid on <br />2008 materials, the firms had based those bids on 2007 prices, so the City was receiving <br />almost adouble-hit on this bid, as those companies attempted to recover from the <br />previous year. Mr. Schwartz advised that, given the unfavorable bids, staff was <br />recommending, even without impacts of reduced MVHC, a reduction in sealcoat projects <br />by 20%, reducing ice control by 10%, reducing sign maintenance by 10%, reducing <br />pavement marking/striping by 25%, and reducing other contractual pavement and curbing <br />repairs by 10%. <br />Other impacts <br />Mr. Schwartz addressed impacts of the recent hiring freeze, noting that the department <br />had two recent retirements in the street division; currently have one military deployment, <br />which he had just received notice that the deployment would be extended another year; <br />two employees out on medical leave, one in the hospital and another scheduled for knee <br />surgery. Mr. Schwartz advised that this situation, in addition to the hiring freeze, <br />significantly impacted his department's ability to deliver major service operations in the <br />summer; and advised that the department would need to rely on additional seasonal staff <br />to bring the department back up to normal staffing levels. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that reductions in his staff would have some impact on the <br />department's assistance to other departments (i.e., plan review; maintenance assistance). <br />Anticipated MVHC-Specific Reduction = $71,000 <br />Mr. Schwartz provided the following options from his perspective in addressing the <br />additional MVHC reduction, from a hypothetical basis: <br />• Administration/Engineering: other than staffing, noting that it was astaff--heavy <br />budget, elimination of seasonal employees, overtime pay, reduced attendance at <br />conferences/training opportunities. Reduce 2009 proposed construction from $5 <br />million to $2.5 million, resulting in a 10% engineering fee internally to the <br />department to send that construction delivery out to a consultant. Mr. Schwartz <br />reviewed the contractual budget, as well as the beneficial value of full-service <br />engineering in-house. <br />^ Streets: Reduce staffing levels further or further program reductions, with the net <br />effect to reduce pavement conditions or response times. <br />^ Lighting: Shut off601ights. <br />^ Building Maintenance: Reduce lighting; increase/reduce heating/cooling seasonally. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.