My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_0309
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_0309
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2009 1:38:00 PM
Creation date
4/2/2009 1:37:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/9/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March 09, 2009 <br />Page 6 <br />Councilmember Johnson expressed concern in accountability for tracking ballots <br />through the process, in the voter's ability to ensure that their ballots were received <br />by mail, while keeping their anonymity throughout the process. <br />Discussion included the process used for tracking and protecting anonymity used <br />in other states using vote by mail options; tracking voter identification via the out- <br />side envelope, with ballots in their secrecy envelopes separated from those outside <br />envelopes; and specific mechanics of voting by mail. <br />Councilmember Roe noted the similarities of the vote by mail process to that at <br />the polls in signing the envelope or voter registration form; however, expressed <br />concern about how a voter could make sure their ballot arrived by mail, and didn't <br />get lost, to ensure the vote was counted; and to also provide another option for <br />that voter in case of a lost ballot. <br />Ms. Curti noted that a bar code would be scanned, similar to today's Absentee <br />Ballot procedure; and anticipated tracking by the voter by Internet or other options <br />to ensure their ballot had been received. <br />Councilmember Pust expressed some hesitation in the City of Roseville signing <br />on for a pilot program until more details of such a program were defined. <br />Mayor Klausing suggested a language change to the resolution allowing the City <br />to participate in a pilot program, rather than current language indicating that it <br />would be required or that the legislature could misinterpret the City's intent. <br />13. d. Discuss City Manager Evaluation Process <br />Mayor Klausing provided draft evaluation forms, originally formatted by Coun- <br />cilmembers Pust and Roe in previous City Manager reviews, with some revisions; <br />and suggested using a survey process via Internet with an outside firm doing the <br />tallying and compilation of the aggregate data. <br />Discussion included timing of the survey for initiation and response time; pro- <br />posed selection of participants, expanded from previous evaluations; potential fee <br />for this outside service; and ability of individual Councilmembers to provide sug- <br />gested names of participants from other organizations that have not, but perhaps <br />should have had interaction with the City Manager. <br />Mayor Klausing suggested that, in making suggestions for other participants out- <br />side City Hall, Councilmembers be sure to provide a contact person who has in- <br />teracted with the City Manager; and that any additional contact information be <br />provided to Mayor Klausing for processing within a week. <br />City Manager Malinen, from his perspective, noted that he would be providing a <br />hard copy of his self-evaluation, in addition to an updated goal outline since his <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.