res_9995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

B The plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the land owner: The mature stand of trees makes sign placement on the property, specifically the front yard adjacent to Lexington Avenue, almost impossible without moving the sign toward the west property line. C The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: The Roseville Planning Commission determined that the placement of a monument sign one foot off of the western property line would not alter the essential character or the locality nor adversely affect the public health, safety or general welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. The sign in its proposed location will not hinder vehicles attempting to turn north or south onto Lexington Avenue nor will the sign limit the ability to place a path within the existing right- of-way. WHEREAS; the Roseville Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the Brentwood Town Office request on May 1, 2002, and concluded that the variance request was reasonable and meets the hardship test, and voted (6 - 0) to recommend approval of the 14 foot setback variance, subject to the following conditions: A. The monument sign must be no more than eight feet in height. B. Perennial plantings and/or shrubs be placed below the sign between the two columns, and east slightly towards the parking lot. C. Any lighting of the sign (no street or residential glare allowed) be concealed at grade. D. A sign permit must be issued specifying the approved location and variance conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to grant Brentwood Town.Offices a 14 foot variance to Section 1009.03M, allowing the installation of a ground mounted (monument) sign one foot from the property along Lexington Avenue; property addressed as 2332 to 2340 Lexington Avenue; based on the findings and conditions indicated above. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Klausing, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Schroeder, Maschka, Klausing, Kough, Kysylyczyn and the following voted against the same: None WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 2 of 2