|
22
<br />23
<br />24
<br />25
<br />2%
<br />29
<br />30
<br />31
<br />32
<br />33
<br />Attachment A
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
<br />OF CITY COUNCIL
<br />CITY OF ROSEVILLE
<br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
<br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville,
<br />County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall at 2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville,
<br />Minnesota, on Monday, the 20th day of April, 2009, at 6:00 o'clock p.m.
<br />The following members were present: and the following were absent:
<br />Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
<br />RESOLUTION
<br />RESOLUTION AWARDING BIDS
<br />FOR 2009 CONTRACT B
<br />WHEREAS, pursuant to advertisement for bids for the improvement, according to the plans and
<br />specifications thereof on file in the office of the Manager of said City, said bids were received on Friday,
<br />April 3, 2009, at 11:00 a.m., opened and tabulated according to law and the following bids were received
<br />complyin with the advertisement:
<br />SIDDER AMOUNT
<br />Tower As halt, Inc. $2,428,706.26
<br />Frattalone Companies $2,489,848.47
<br />Asphalt Surface Technology Corp. (aka
<br />ASTECH Corp.)
<br />TA Schifsky & Sons, Inc
<br />North Valley, Inc
<br />Hardrives, Inc.
<br />Midwest Asphalt Corporation
<br />Park Construction
<br />$2,491,836.78
<br />$2,610,222.69
<br />$2,675,361.01
<br />$2,762,509.35
<br />$2,807,796.75
<br />$3,000,842.37
<br />WHEREAS, Tower Asphalt, Inc., and Frattalone Companies' bids did not comply with General Provision
<br />section 249.0. Limits on Mobilization, and
<br />WHEREAS, Asphalt Surface Technology Corp. (aka ASTECH Corp.) of St. Cloud, Minnesota, is the lowest
<br />responsible bidder at the tabulated price of $2,491,836.78, and
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota:
<br />1
<br />2
<br />The City rejects the bids of Tower Asphalt, Inc. and Frattalone Companies for non-compliance with
<br />General Provision section 249.0 that limits mobilization to 5% of the contract price. Soth of these
<br />contractors exceeded this mobilization amount.
<br />The Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Asphalt
<br />
|