My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0420_Packet_Exec
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0420_Packet_Exec
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 2:40:32 PM
Creation date
4/20/2009 8:54:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />addressed the exterior building materials, opining that it looked like the back of a warehouse, without a <br />� front door. Mr. Peterson opined that there were many vacancies currently in Roseville, and that another <br />� office building was not necessary. Mr. Peterson addressed his observations of bicycle accidents at <br />� County Road B and Lexington; excess speeds over the posted 35 mph; and expressed concerns with the <br />� triangle of safety for cars and pedestrians. Mr. Peterson expressed concern that residential property <br />� values would decrease further; and again addressed his apparent lack of notice and communication <br />� regarding this application. <br />� At the request of Chair Bakeman, City Planner Thomas Paschke addressed the notification process used, <br />� and reviewed the actual list of property owners notified, 500' from the property line of the development <br />� site, in addition to posted and published notice. <br />� Cindy Wilson, 1172 Sandhurst Drive <br />� As part of the record, written comments were received from Dr. Douglas Wilson, attached hereto <br />� and made a part thereof. <br />� Ms. Wlson advised that she was located eight (8) houses from this home, and had not received a notice <br />� either. Ms. Wlson opined that the property should remain residential to avoid decreasing home values; <br />� noted current lighting pollution from the SuperAmerica property to her home; and addressed major traffic <br />� concerns at that intersection and impacts to pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Ms. Wilson noted that there <br />� were no sidewalks along Sandhurst; and that Lexington was a huge trunk for emergency vehicles, which <br />� were not traveling at 35 mph, creating more potential for accidents. While supporting a use other than the <br />� existing TCF Bank building, Ms. Wilson expressed concern with removing a residence to put in a parking <br />� lot, and opined that the parking lot should be reduced to avoid taking that home. <br />� Andrejs Vape <br />� Mr. Vape opined that, if more residential on that site was not possible, he would suggest more appealing <br />� architectural amenities, with entrance on County Road B, and parking on the side to avoid additional <br />� traffic congestion on Sandhurst. <br />� Mr. Vape also noted the lack of notice he had received about the proposal. <br />� Chair Bakeman requested that staff review the notification process, and verify those property owners on <br />� the list for future notices. <br />� Paul Mergens, 1126 Sandhurst <br />� Mr. Mergens, in listening to public comments tonight, noted the negativity; however, he opined that <br />� Roseville, as an inner ring suburb, could do worse than the proposed use on that corner; and suggested <br />� that citizens focus more on positives of the proposal. Mr. Mergens opined that this may be a wonderful <br />� asset to the community; and noted that some of the city's homes needed repair, replacement or removal; <br />� and suggested that there were positives to this proposal. <br />� Chair Bakeman recessed the meeting at approximately 8:34 p.m, and reconvened <br />� at approximately 8:40 p.m. <br />� Applicant Response, Sonja Simonsen <br />� Ms. Simonsen addressed some of the comments from tonight's public testimony, noting that the building <br />� use was currently retail, and that this use should generate less traffic and vehicular traffic, with 740 <br />� vehicles per day for a retail use, and only 350 vehicles per day for office use. Ms. Simonsen further noted <br />� that Wellington was the current owners of the commercial TCF Bank building and property; and had no <br />� intention of continuing down the block with commercial development; and recognized appropriate <br />� concerns of residents related to that potential. Ms. Simonson further addressed the applicant's <br />� willingness, at the direction of the Planning Commission, to hold an additional open house, and noted <br />� staff's cooperation in assisting with notifying applicable property owners; and stressed that opinions of the <br />� residents were of value to Wellington. <br />� Chair Bakeman closed the Public Hearing at approximately 8:43 p.m. <br />� Mr. Paschke, for the record, verified that Mr. Vape had been on the mailing list for notices, listed at a post <br />� office box, for both the open house and public hearing process notices. <br />� Discussion among Commissioners and staff included Chair Bakeman's request prior to tonight's Public <br />� Hearing, for individual commissioners to review the Comprehensive Plan for future development and <br />redefining various business types, of which Neighborhood Business designation was one of three; and <br />types of businesses to be considered in that land use designation, as defined. <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.