My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0126_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0126_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2012 3:24:10 PM
Creation date
4/20/2009 9:31:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
36 category. During the period between the last Steering Committee meeting and the <br />37 Planning Commission hearing, several Steering Committee members worked <br />38 together to revise the Community Business future land use definition in hopes of <br />39 bringing a resolution to this issue. The revised definition includes 100,000 square <br />40 feet as a building footprint guideline, but would allow for buildings to exceed that if <br />41 they were subject additional design requirements. They presented their revised <br />42 definition in the letter cited above. One Committee member spoke against the <br />43 100,000-square-foot building size restriction in the definition. <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />2.2.4 Master Plans: Four Steering Committee members prepared a memorandum to the <br />Planning Commission recommending that all current and future land use master <br />plans be adopted into the Comprehensive Plan. One Steering Committee member <br />and one resident spoke on behalf of this position. <br />50 2.3 On October 13, 2008, the City Council took up the matter of releasing the draft Plan to <br />51 neighboring and affected units of government and special districts. Meeting minutes from <br />52 this meeting are attached to this memorandum in Attachment C. The City Council made two <br />53 modifications to the draft forwarded by the Planning Commission. These modifications <br />54 included changing the future land use designation for the HarMar Mall to Community <br />55 Business, and adding language to the land use implementation strategies regarding parkland <br />56 and the need for parkland in Planning District 14. <br />57 <br />58 2.4 The following table identifies modifications made to the draft Comprehensive Plan by both <br />59 the Planning Commission and City Council. <br />60 <br />i i ' � i i i i i i i <br />Cha ter 4: Land Use <br />Pg. 4-2 Under Goal #1 of the General Land Use <br />Goals and Policies, removed tl�at clause <br />`...as well as the crearion of community <br />gathering spaces" to make it read better. <br />Pg. 4-3 Removed policy 5.3 of the Land Use <br />Cl�apter as they felt it was redundant and <br />similar with policy 5.4. <br />Pg. 4-4 Based on comments by the City Attorney, <br />Pg 4-22 modified language in policy 13 2 under the <br />Land Use Cl�apter (Ch 4) to now read <br />"Develop and utilize master plans, as <br />official controls, for redevelopment areas in <br />order to achieve an appropriate miature of <br />uses in the mixed-use areas designated on <br />the 2030 Future Land Use Map".; and under <br />the discussion of Planning District 10 in the <br />Land Use Chapter, amending the language <br />to now read "The City � intends to <br />relv on the following official controls and <br />environmental studies to guide land use and <br />to evaluate specific proposals." <br />i i ' � i i i i i i i <br />2 of 6 012609 Approval of 2030 Comprehensive Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.