My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0126_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0126_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2012 3:24:10 PM
Creation date
4/20/2009 9:31:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />Extract of the Meetin� Minutes from the October 1, 200� <br />Roseville Planning Commission Meetin� <br />b. PROJECT FILE 0004 <br />Review and approve a final draft of the City of Roseville's Comprehensive Plan Update <br />Chair Bakeman opened the Public Hearing for Project File 0004. <br />Chair Bakeman complimented staff on their preparation and presentation of this project report and its <br />specificities. <br />Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon <br />Mr. Trudgeon provided a brief review of the staff report dated October 1, 2008 on the Draft 2030 Roseville <br />Comprehensive Plan, in anticipation of Planning Commission recommendation to the City Council for <br />distribution of the Plan to adjacent governmental jurisdictions, special taxing districts and school districts. <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that Economic Development Associate Jamie Radel would present information on <br />the process to-date, the work of the Steering Committee, and specific chapters within the actual <br />Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Trudgeon advised that then he would review specific and remaining issues of <br />the Steering Committee that did not get consensus, having received only majority support. <br />Mr. Trudgeon reviewed State Statute requirements for review by the eight (8) adjacent municipalities as <br />well as the City of Roseville's review of their Plans. Mr. Trudgeon referenced the aggressive timeframe <br />detailed on page 5 of the staff report, and anticipated additional Public Hearing at the December 3, 2008 <br />Planning Commission meeting, and City Council public comment and approval of the plan. <br />Economic Development Associate Jamie Radel <br />Ms. Radel briefly reviewed the process to-date as detailed in the staff report, including hiring of <br />Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGI) by the City Council in September of 2007 as consultant to facilitate <br />this process; appointment of the Steering Committee; public participation opportunities; review by City <br />Advisory Commissions and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA); and periodic Planning <br />Commission and City Council updates throughout the process. <br />Ms. Radel noted that the thirteen (13) member Steering Committee had held fourteen (14) meetings; held <br />two (2) Open Houses (one in March of 2008 with 70-80 in attendance, and another in August of 2008 with <br />25-30 in attendance, many of whom were Committee members, staff and consultants). <br />Ms. Radel noted that the plan consisted of eleven (11) chapters, and included a future land use map; <br />goals and policies; and proposed future land use designations. Ms. Radel noted that the staff report <br />detailed each of the eleven chapters by description, of content and Steering Committee action, and <br />included approval and/or majority/minority support of those chapters, with the "Land Use" and "Using the <br />Plan" chapters specifically lacking consensus. <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted that the Steering Committee process had provided consensus through discussion <br />and compromise for the majority of the Plan; however, advised that there were three remaining issues <br />pending consensus: <br />• The role of master plans within the Plan and how they would be utilized; <br />• The definition of the Community Business future land use category and limitation of their footprints at <br />100,000 square feet; and <br />• The future land use designation of the Har Mar Mall and SuperTarget (currently designated "Regional <br />Business" with proposal to revise to "Community Business.") <br />Community Business <br />Mr. Trudgeon reviewed page 4-7 and 4-8 of the Comprehensive Plan and differentiations between <br />Regional Business (RB) and Community Business (CB) land use designations; noting that the Steering <br />Committee had voted 7/6 on several proposed amendments to the language and whetherto limit building <br />footprints to 100,000 square feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.