My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0330_ Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0330_ Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2012 3:41:20 PM
Creation date
4/20/2009 12:57:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Member Ihlan <br />Attachment A. <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: MEMBERS OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: AMY IHLAN <br />SUBJECT: WATER BILLING STRUCTURE AND HOW TO ACHIEVE <br />CONSERVATION RATES <br />DATE: MARCH 4, 2009 <br />Based on the DNR's guidelines and the suggestions from Senator John Marty, I would like <br />to have council discussion and direct staff to formulate amendments to the ciry's water <br />billing structure to comply with state law requiring a billing structure "that encourages <br />conservation." To create a conservation rate structure that meets state law requirements, we <br />need to consider the following amendments to our new utility billing rates: <br />1. Create additional usage tiers or "blocks" with greater cost increases between blocks. <br />The DNR Conservation Rate guidelines state that: <br />The increase in cost between each block should be significant enough (25% or <br />more and 50% between the last two steps) to encourage conservation. <br />Roseville's residential billing rates include only two usage "blocks", and the increase <br />in cost between them is less than 10%, not significant enough to encourage <br />conservation by the DNR's standards. We should consider creating more usage <br />blocks with significant cost increases between them, so that residents who conserve <br />water and stay within the lower usage tiers will be rewarded by paying significantly <br />less than residents who don't. For example, we could look at rate structures that <br />create additional usage blocks under 30,000 gallons, with the highest rate for usage of <br />more than 30,000 gallons (and increasing by at least 50% over the next highest rate). <br />2. There are no usage blocks for commercial properties. We should also create a tiered <br />usage block rate structure for commercial properties that meets DNR guidelines. If <br />there is a large dispariry in water use among business, the tiers should reflect the <br />range of usage so that small users pay significantly less than large users do. <br />It's questionable whether a higher summer rate will be any kind of ineaningful <br />incentive to conserve for commercial property owners. Is there any evidence that <br />commercial water usage tends to increase in the summer by the same percentage that <br />residential use increases? <br />3. We might also want to review the base rates in light of the DNR's statement that: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.