My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0330_ Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0330_ Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2012 3:41:20 PM
Creation date
4/20/2009 12:57:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WRITES <br />Columbia Pike <br />ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, I1d5 <br />seen explosive development along the <br />Metro (subway) corridors over the past 30 <br />years, while Columbia Pilce, the 3.5-mile <br />(5.6-Icm) "Main StreeY' for the southem <br />portion of the county, has languished. <br />Although it is a historic thoroughfare <br />running from the Pentagon to the Arling- <br />ton/Fairfax County line, its current form <br />resembles strip commercial zones every- <br />where: an arterial that carries approxi- <br />mately 30,00o vehicles a day, varying in <br />width from four to six lanes and lined pri- <br />marily with parlcing lots and low buildings. <br />Columbia Pilce was the most underde- <br />veloped area in a county that is otherwise <br />built out. County leaders wanted to encour- <br />age economic development and also create <br />a mixed-use pedestrian environment that <br />would allow for future light rail or bus rapid <br />transit. <br />During an intensive finro-year visioning <br />process, the county recognized that its reg- <br />ulations would never produce the desired <br />results, a traditional Main Street. The effort <br />led to the adoption of a form-based code <br />in Zoo3. <br />The Columbia Pilce code is optional— <br />all e�cisting zoning remains in place—with <br />incentives such as expedited review to <br />encourage its use. Since passage, the vast <br />majority of development proposals have <br />opted to use the new form-based code. <br />' . � <br />��'.4 �' "��rY+� , <br />a• <br />� � �^ 7 <br />�"�e .�. <br />�.-= �, �. <br />' , � �e�� <br />i a ° °�� w � � � �§' �' ��Ta e a'��r5 <br />��a � �:�, r.� _, `r'?� , <br />; � �{.w ��� . :� ...... Y., . <br />���Y° � r � *�:�:� ..�.; `�. � ►�: <br />�4...+.�._5" -`� 'r• <br />��1s� ��_�__�---�---��� ` �- - - ��� <br />_ - — � <br />�• - f —... �" i" , l � <br />�� <br />> �°� <br />°i� <br />�� <br />�r <br />In the wal<e of Hurricane Katrina, many <br />coastal communities are discovering that their <br />historic cores cannot be rebuilt after disaster <br />stril<es. The magnitude of the recovery effort <br />�%B URBAN LAND SEPTEMBER 2006 <br />has led many of them to explore a model <br />form-based code I<nown as the SmartCode to <br />sidestep the need for customized codes for <br />each communiry. The goal is to re-create the <br />historic form of the older sections of town, <br />rather than the sprawl around the edge, and <br />to rebuild "better than before:' <br />The next frontier for form-based codes is <br />to carry out regional planning. By extending <br />the tools used to regulate urban form in small <br />areas, regional development patterns can also <br />be coded (for instance, laying out intercon- <br />nected road networlcs and allowing for re- <br />gional stormwater management). It is no <br />longer credible to believe that incremental <br />development decisions are sufficient to shape <br />regional growth patterns. <br />Form-based codes focus on end results— <br />the creation of desirable physical places. They <br />are ideal for jurisdictions seeldng a funda- <br />mental change in urban form and character— <br />for instance, when redeveloping areas that <br />have become obsolete or which were poorly <br />planned at the outset. <br />Whether it is a gre�eld conversion of a <br />dead mall or revitalization of an aging com- <br />mercial corridor, a shared physical vision for <br />the desired character is the essential first <br />step. Form-based codes quantify that vision <br />into physical parameters that replace the pre- <br />existing zoning standards. <br />Typically, the result is the regulation of pri- <br />vate and public development to create valu- <br />able public spaces that did not exist before. <br />For instance, overly wide streets can be con- <br />verted into places where pedestrians and com- <br />merce can meet to their mutual benefit; new <br />public spaces such as plazas can create cen- <br />ters of attention in homogeneous subdivisions. <br />Form-based codes can also be used for <br />finer-grained projects, such as infill redevelop- <br />ment downtown or in bypassed ciry neighbor- <br />hoods, or as a tool for regulating new con- <br />struction in historic districts. These codes can <br />be written to protect the existing urban fabric, <br />or they can serve to transform it. <br />National Trends <br />Cities and counties across the country are <br />replacing parts oftheir conventional zoningwith <br />form-based codes, to enable local governments <br />to carry outvisionary place-mal<ing plans. <br />One prominent example is in unincorpo- <br />rated Dade Counry, Florida, where land around <br />the Dadeland Mall, a regional shopping attrac- <br />tion, is being converted into a downtown for <br />the sprawling communiry of Kendall. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.