Laserfiche WebLink
which have the effect of increasing the cost of housing so that it is beyond the means of lower- <br />income households.6s <br />In the years since the widespread adoption of zoning as the principal tool of city planners, <br />there has been a sea change in the challenges facing the American city. First, in a number of <br />older American cities in the Northeast and Midwest, a significant problem is growing <br />depopulation rather than overcrowding.66 Next, many cities, rather than remaining centers for <br />capital production and accumulation, have become post-industrial specters of their former selves, <br />often largely populated by members of racial and ethnic minority groups employed in low-wage <br />65 See e.g. S. Burlington County NAACP v. Mount Laurel, 336 A.2d 713 (N.J. 1975) <br />(hereinafter Mt. Laurel I); S. Burlington County NAACP v. Mount Laurel, 456 A.2d 390 (N.J. <br />1983) (hereinafter Mt. Laurel II). In Mt. Laurel I, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that <br />municipalities had a constitutional obligation to provide a"fair share" of low- and moderate- <br />income housing. The decision responded to a variety of zoning practices in rural and suburban <br />communities that were designed to exclude affordable housing from these areas. The court <br />found that exclusionary zoning went against the communities' obligations to provide for the <br />welfare of not only the town but the general region. In Mt. Laurel II, the New Jersey Supreme <br />Court discussed the fact that municipalities were failing to address the sorts of exclusionary <br />zoning practices which had been the basis of Mt. Laurel I. Hence, the New Jersey Supreme Court <br />reaffirmed the principles of the earlier decision and required municipalities to implement a <br />variety of "affirmative" governmental mechanisms. One of the most noteworthy aspects of the <br />decision was the Court's provision of a"builder's remedy," which allowed builders or <br />landowners who wanted to provide low- and moderate-income housing in a jurisdiction to sue a <br />municipality to obtain approval notwithstanding existing zoning standards for an area. <br />66 See M. Christine Boyer, Dreaming the Rational City: The Myth of American City Planning <br />237 (1986).The "rust belt" phenomenon, the deindustrialization, decay and depopulation of older <br />United States cities has been produced by a number of factors, among them the loss of <br />manufacturing jobs and their partial replacement by knowledge-intensive white collar jobs often <br />requiring post-secondary education. John D. Kasarda, Cities as Places Where People Live and <br />Work: Urban Change and Neighborhood Distress, in Interwoven Destinies: Cities and the Nation <br />81, 83 (Henry Cisneros ed., 1993). This has meant that already present poorly educated inner city <br />residents were excluded from employment. Id. The decline of these Northeastern and <br />Midwestern cities has, however, to a great extent been paralleled by the almost exponential <br />growth of "sun belt" cities in the South and Southwest. Eli Ginzberg, The Changing Urban <br />Scene: 1960-1990 and Beyond, in Interwoven Destinies: Cities and the Nation 31, 35-37 (Henry <br />Cisneros ed., 1993). <br />19 <br />