My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0309_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0309_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2012 2:47:18 PM
Creation date
4/20/2009 1:00:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B R 1 G G 5 A�o M O R G A ftil <br />March 4, 2009 <br />Page 2 <br />charged. Therefore a literal interpretation of the statute defeats its goal of making housing <br />affordable to all. <br />At any rate, whether we consider policy or solely the text of the statute, the Centennial <br />Gardens Project was still out of compliance for some portion of the units as acknowledged in Mr. <br />Jones's letter. We suggest evaluating Gardens East Partnership's original quantification of its <br />noncompliance as approximately $1,700. That way, the Council will have applied the more <br />cautious standard in determining whether or not the noncompliance was insubstantial and, if a <br />court ever determined that it is incorrect to exclude amounts paid under the Section 8 voucher <br />program from the determination of rent, the Council would not have to reevaluate a finding of <br />insubstantiality. <br />Sincerely, <br />t <br />����1 <br />Mary L. Ippel <br />JSB <br />zsonsi�z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.