Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />Date: 3/09/09 <br />Item: 13.d <br />VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS <br />RESPONSISILITY <br />• Maintains awareness of developments and plans in other jurisdictions that may relate to or <br />affect City government. <br />• Establishes and maintains a liaison with other governmental jurisdictions in those areas of <br />service that improve or enhance the City's programs. <br />• Maintains communications with governmental jurisdictions with which the City is involved <br />orinterfaces. <br />PERFORMANCE STANDARD <br />Intergovernmental relations will be considered effective when a majority of the conditions have <br />been successfully fulfilled. <br />• Sufficient activity with municipal and professional organizations. <br />• Regarded as leader by municipal officials. <br />• Provides examples of good ideas from other jurisdictions. <br />• Positive relationship with surrounding cities. <br />• Good cooperation with County and State agencies. <br />• Understands problems of other agencies and jurisdictions in achieving City objectives. <br />• Constructively cooperative in interacting with other agencies and jurisdictions in achieving <br />City objectives. <br />Rating <br />1 2 <br />Selow <br />Expectations <br />Comments: (Observations of Evaluator) <br />3 <br />Meets <br />Expectations <br />4 <br />Suggestions for Improvements: (Specific area(s) that need strengthening) <br />5 <br />Exceeds <br />Expectations <br />Commendations: (Area(s) of performance calling for praise/commendation) <br />E:a <br />