2009-06-09_Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Human Rights Commission Meeting Minutes -May 12, 2009 Page 2 of 4 • 1 Motion carried: All ayes - 4/0. 2 3 Member Grefenberg expressed concern that the minutes reflect the actual language from the 4 Imagine Roseville 2025 report, and moved: 5 Page 5, Line 39, Additional language as follows: 6 "[Educate community members on the appreciation and contributions of diversity and 7 its issues, and provide means to repair damage caused by prejudice and exclusion; 8 convey a clear message that diversity is a community asset and that intolerance is not 9 welcome in our community.J" 10 The Chair declared the motion failed due to lack of a second. 11 12 Member Grefenberg moved that language be inserted on Page 5, Line 36 as follows: 13 Page 5, Line 36, Additional language in parentheses immediately following the 14 reference to Lines 23 - 26 of the Imagine Roseville 2025 report: 15 "(Educate community members on the appreciation and contributions of diversity and 16 its issues, and provide means to repair damage caused by prejudice and exclusion; 17 convey a clear message that diversity is a community asset and that intolerance is not 18 welcome in our community.) " 19 The Chair declared the motion failed due to lack of a second. 20 21 City Manager Malinen noted that Page 1, Line 14 should reflect that Chair Singleton, rather than 22 the City Manager administered the Oath of Office to new Commissioners. Correction approved ~3 by Member consensus. 24 25 Member Grefenberg requested clarification of the process for making corrections to the minutes 26 prior to the meeting. 27 28 Chair Singleton said he would cover that and review other protocols with City Manager Malinen 29 and advise members within the next two weeks. 30 31 Member Yates moved, seconded by Member Grefenberg, to approve the meeting minutes of 32 April 14, 2009 as amended. Motion carried: All ayes - 4/0. 33 34 Discussion about conducting another Cultural Complementarity Forum 35 Chair Singleton had not yet received a return call from Ms. Loudi Rivamonte, with United Way 36 and part of the planning group for the last Forum, to arrange a meeting to discuss a process and 37 expectations, now that Ms. Loudi is no longer under the auspices of the United Way and working 38 independently. Chair Singleton wants to clarify several things before moving forward with 39 another forum. 40 41 Member Yates suggested a conversation with the United Way to clarify their position and 42 Loudi's role, to be respectful of their involvement and changes within the United Way. 43 44 Discussion included previous compensation to the United Way of $300 for their facilitation and ~5 involvement, and fee expectations for independent consultations; concerns about no longer