My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_0615
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_0615
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2009 2:07:34 PM
Creation date
7/6/2009 2:07:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/15/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 15, 2009 <br />Page 6 <br />personally shared that concern, and noted that the City Council was open to sug- <br />gestions to alleviate ongoing budget shortfalls. <br />Further discussion included a comprehensive review of City services to determine <br />those that may no longer be relevant and re-examining financing across depart- <br />ments for City services; expectations of the community that the community's <br />parks and recreation opportunities are also a core value, similar to the Police, Fire <br />and Public Works functions; and historic funding cuts in the Parks and Recreation <br />Department, rather than city-wide reductions;. <br />Councilmember Johnson noted that this year's budget process will be somewhat <br />different as the City Council moves toward budgeting for outcomes; and all items <br />would be reviewed from that perspective. Councilmember Johnson concurred <br />that the Parks and Recreation Department had taken the hit over the years; how- <br />ever, he opined that even though these are tough times, he thought expenditures <br />for the department were a wise expenditure for the City, and a good place to put <br />money now. Councilmember Johnson reiterated that this budget process would <br />be difficult and different; but that it would allow the City Council to identify what <br />projects and services the City could provide and their actual value to the commu- <br />nity; with citizens needing to understand the situation facing cities at this time. <br />Councilmember Roe opined that it made sense to better position the City finan- <br />cially; noting funding gaps for all capital needs had already been identified; and <br />noted the suggestion of the Commission to discuss a referendum following the <br />Park Master Planning process to seek citizen support and to endow some of the <br />future costs for the Department. Councilmember Roe offered his support of a ref- <br />erendum to allow for endowing capital improvements for the park system. <br />Councilmember Ihlan suggested that the bond issue serve to create endowments <br />for parks, park maintenance and to allow acquisition of key natural areas when <br />they became available. <br />Councilmember Roe noted that it was a lot easier to do acquisition when the City <br />was still growing; however, now that the City was fully developed, he supported <br />involving citizens to seek their support for moving forward. <br />Further discussion included allocation of funds for park improvements pulled to <br />address diseased and hazardous tree removal; and whether the City Council was <br />supportive of a Tree Replacement Program and Ordinance. <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of a Tree Replacement Program that <br />would be incorporated in the City's land use process for tree preservation on pri- <br />vate property as well as public property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.