My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0511_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0511_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 2:43:33 PM
Creation date
7/28/2009 2:21:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
%.5 Th2 GENERAL CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 1S 1 pI'OC2SS by Wh1Ch 1 <br />� development/redevelopment proposal is formally presented in a public hearing to the <br />1 Planning Commission for consideration. A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) is a <br />� zoning district, which may include a single or mix of uses on one or more lots or parcels, <br />� and is intended to be used in unique situations to create more flexibility, creativity, and <br />� efficient approach to the use of the land subject to procedures, standards, and regulations <br />� contained in the City Code. If the City Council ultimately approves the GENExAL <br />� CoNCEPT, the applicant then prepares fully detailed development plans for final approval <br />� by the City Council. <br />� 7.6 Concept PUD: Art Mueller seeks consideration of a General Concept PUD to pursue <br />� finalization of a senior living community at 2025 County Road S. The 2.61-acre parcel <br />� would consist of a 3-story, 55-unit structure primarily oriented along the north and east <br />� sides of the parcel and the property would be rezoned from Single Family Residence <br />� District (R-1) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) using the General Residence District <br />� (R-3) as a guide for the site development. <br />� 7.7 Suilding Height: The proposed Orchard development will be 3-stories of senior housing <br />� over a level of parking and storage. The overall height of the building is anticipated to be <br />� approximately 46-feet; however the height when measured to the midpoint of the roof <br />� truss (Code required height measurement) will be 38 feet. The Roseville City Code has a <br />� height limitation of three stories and a m�imum of 30 feet for buildings within the R-3 <br />� district. The Planning Division has concluded that these two requirements are in conflict <br />� with one another and difficult to rationally apply to development proposals. Sy <br />� comparison, Midland Grove Condominiums (a flat roof building) is approximately 34 <br />� feet in height to the top of roof parapet. The Planning Division has also reviewed multi- <br />� story senior or other housing projects dating back to 2000 and concluded most of these <br />� buildings meet the 3-story limitation, but exceed the 30-foot height limitation. These <br />� include Greenhouse Village, Midland Villas, Applewood Pointe, and Sunrise Assisted <br />� Living. <br />� 7.8 Suilding to Lot Size: The City Code also requires 2,000 sq. ft. of lot area for one- <br />� bedroom units and 2,800 sq. ft. of lot area for 2 to 4 bedroom units. A calculation of the <br />� proposed/anticipated unit mix (10-1 bedroom, 30-2 bedroom, and 15-3 bedroom units) <br />� would require lot area totaling 146,000 sq. ft. or lot 3.35 acres in size. Similarly, the City <br />� Code requires a floor area ratio of .5 or 50%. A calculation of floor area for the proposed <br />� Orchard concludes 92,571 sq. ft. of floor area or 2.13 acres and a floor area ratio of .95. <br />� The Planning Division has reviewed the similar projects approved by the City since 2000 <br />� (Green House Village, Midland Villas, Applewood Pointe, and Sunrise Assisted Living) <br />� and determined all have been allowed to deviate from this standard requirement as part of <br />� a PUD. Given the limitations of land conducive for multi-story housing and the number <br />� of units and types necessary to market and be a successful project, it is very difficult to <br />� achieve compliance with these two requirements. The Planning Division believes that <br />� the nature of a Planned Unit Development intended to be used in unique situations to <br />� create more flexibility, creativity, and efficient approach to the use of the land gives the <br />� ability for this project to deviate from certain standards. <br />� 7.9 Suilding Design: Since the Planning Commission's consideration of the project the <br />� applicant has completed a number of modifications to the building footprint to address <br />massing and setback concerns. <br />PF09-002 RCA 051109.doc <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.