2009_0511_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� 7.10 The northeast corner of the building is now proposed at a 45-degree angle versus the 2� previous 90-degree. This modification softens the view and breaks-up the wall expanse 2� and lessens the visual impact from properties to the east and northeast. 2� 7.11 The building now includes various jogs to assist in breaking-up the long expanse for the 2� north and south sides. 2� 7.12 The southeast "L" wing of the building now jogs at an angle when it approaches County 2� Road S. This design element will soften the impact of the building and give it added 2� character, privacy, and curb appeal. The third floor now steps back 10 feet further form 2� the property line than the lower floors. At the northwest corner of the building the third 2� floor steps back a full unit. 2� 7.13 The angled "L" wing also features a small end capped roof to soften the perceived height 2� of the structure. The roofline has been lowered and additional design features added to 2� give the appearance of a single family structure at the south elevation. 2� 7.14 The setbacks of the building adjacent the north and east property lines have been 2� increased; the north varies from 21 feet to 36.9 feet and the east varies from 30.5 feet to 2� 51.7 feet. 2� 7.15 Exterior material would be maintenance-free, likely to include asphalt shingles, 2� metal/aluminum soffit and fascia, vinyl or concrete (Hardiboard) siding, brick and/or 2� rock-face block. 2� 7.16 Setbacks: The Orchard has a minimum 10 foot front yard setback from Midland Grove 2� Road, a varying corner side yard setback adjacent to County Road S of 28.4 to 39.8 feet, 2: a varying side yard setback from the north property line of 21 to 36.9 feet (the proposed 2: structure would lie approximately 180 feet from the Midland Grove Condominium 2: building) , and a varying rear yard setback from the east property line of 30.5 to 51.7 feet. 2: Decks and patios would encroach 6 feet closer to the north and east property lines. The 2: Roseville City Code (R-3 District) requires a 30-foot front-yard setback (west), a 30-foot 2: corner side yard setback (south) , a 10-foot interior side yard setback (north) , and a 30- 2: foot rear-yard setback (east) . As shown on the Site Plan, the Orchard meets most of these 2: setback requirements. The DRC has discussed the possibility of vacating a portion of the 2: underutilized right-of-way for Midland Grove Road, which, if vacated, could increase the 2: official front yard setback, but would not change its proximity to the road. 2� 7.17 Access/Traffic: The applicant proposes to access the site and building via Midland Grove 2� Road (a public road). Trip Generation engineering data (Institute of Transportation 2� Engineers' Trip Generation Report, 8th Edition (2008)) provided by the applicant's 2� consultant indicates that a 55-unit senior development could generate approximately 193 2� trips/day overall or approximately 3.5 trips/day per household. Assuming the same trip 2� generation from the Midland Grove Condominium, the existing 174 units would create 2� 609 trips per day or a total of 802 trips per day for the two developments. 2� 7.18 Parkin�: Section 1019.10(A) of the City Code sets minimum parking standards by use. 2� This section does not specifically identify a parking requirement for assisted-living units 2� as a use and, per to Section 1019.10 (S) ,"where land uses are proposed that are not 24 specifically listed above [within 1019.10(A)], the City Council shall establish a 24 reasonable number of off-street parking space for such use." The City Code has 24 established parking requirements for nursing homes and senior housing at one space per 24 four beds and one enclosed space plus 0.3 spaces of visitor parking, respectively. The � Planning Division has determined that on-site parking shall be 55 enclosed and 16 PF09-002 RCA 051109.doc Page 6 of 8