2009_0511_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1 d. PLAIVNING FILE 09-002 2 REVISED Request by Art Muelter for appro�al of a COMPR�HEN5IVE LAN� USE 3 PLAN AMENDMENT to change #he land use designation of 2025 County Road B � #rom Low Density Residential ta Hi.gh Density Residential; REZONINC of the � property from Single-Family Residence to Planned Unit De�elopment (PUD) with an 6 underiyinglt�ase zo�ing of General Residence Dist.rict; and a GENERAL CO�VCEPT � PL.ANNED UNIT [�EVELOPMENT (PUD} to allow the consfruction of a 55-unit, 3- 8 story Active Senior Living Community 9 Chair BaKerr�an opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 09-002 (9:25 p.m.) 1� City Planner Thamas Paschke re�iewed staff's analysis of the request af Art Mueller, in 11 caoperation with Sue and Andrew Weyer, property owners, ta redevelop the proPerty at �2 2025 County Road B into a three {3) story, fifty-five (55) unif senior li�ing camrnunity. �3 Mr. paschke advised that; in general, the design was similar to that previously presented, �4 but with a reduction in the number of stories to three (3} ar�d redu.ction in the number af � � units at fifty-five (55}. 76 Mr. Paschke requested that the Commission clearly address whether they supported � 7 guiding the subject. parcel to a designation other than Low �e�sity in order ta establish a � g foundation for further review of the current proposal. �� Staff recammended the following actions related to the request of Art Mueller to 2o redevelap 2025 County Road B with a 55-unit, 3-siory Active Seniar Living Community: 21 9.1 RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the C�MPREHENSIV� LAND USE MAP �2 AMENDMENT of 2025 County Road B from Low �ensity Residen#ial (LR) to High �3 Densfty Residential (HR) 2� 9:2 RECOMEMND APRPOVAL of the R�ZONWG of 2025 County Road B from Singie 25 Family Residential (R-1} io Planned Unit Development {PUD), with an underlying 2� zoning of General Residence District {R-3). 2i 9.3 RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the GENEaAL CONCEPT PLANNED 11�fIT 2� DEVELOPMENT, as prepared for the March 4, 2009 Planning Comm[ssian meeting; 2� subject to the conditions detailed in Section 9 of the staff report; with finaf approval by 3� the City Councii considered after all conditions and required documents and permits 3� have been submiited for final approval; with those fir�al approvals considered as a 32 separate application pracess,. 33 Chair Bakeman Iead a discussion for clarification on land use designatian caiegories far 3�i den.sity: Low Rensity at 0 to 4 unitslacre; Medium Densify at 5— 92 uniislacre; artd High 35 Density greater than 13 unitslacre. 36 Staff noted that this praposed us� was cansistent wi#h 6— 7 other senior or rr�ulti-family 37 type residential projec#s approved by the City over the last ten (10) years in similarly 38 related surrounding neighborhaads. 39 Applicant, Art Mueller, 2201 Ac�rn Road a� At the requ�st o� Chair Bakeman, Mr. Mueller addressed the differences between the �1 pre�ious and current proposal, based on public testimony and Planning Commission az concerns. Mr. Mueller noted reductions in square foatage, the number of u�its, additional 43 underground parking space; and his support of th� seven (7} staff-recommended �a conditions as detailed in th.e staff report dated March 4, 2009. �5 Tirn Johnson, Station 19 Architeets �� On behalf of Mr. Mu�ller, Mr. Johnson provided re�isions #o the architectural nature of the ai building and relative facatian and setbacks to Midland Grove Road; reduction in the 48 overafl footprint; and relocation of the driveway and minimal reduced pavement area, in a9 addition to meefing setback requirements. 50 Mr. Johnson asked that the Alanning Commissian consider land use designation higher 51 than Low Density; opining that this parcel was �ot, but shauld have been, considered in 52 the o�erail Comprehensi�e Plan Update, recently completed and currently before the