My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0615_ Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0615_ Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 2:52:23 PM
Creation date
7/28/2009 2:44:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Department Approval <br />� <br />Item Description <br />BACKGROUND <br />l�'�, <br />Jy <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: 6/15/09 <br />Item No. : 12. e <br />City Manager Approval <br />Award Bid for Twin Lakes Infrastructure Improvements <br />The Twin Lakes Infrastructure Improvements Project consists of the construction of Twin Lakes <br />Parkway, between Cleveland Avenue and Mount Ridge Road, and the construction of Mount <br />Ridge Road, between Twin Lakes Parkway and County Road G2. The project was advertised <br />for bid in May. The bids were opened at 10 a.m. on Monday, June 1, 2009. The contract as bid <br />included a base bid as well as a number of alternates. These were added to ensure that the <br />awarded bid would meet our budget for this project. What follows is a brief description of the <br />bid alternates. <br />Building removal- in order to construct the improvements two buildings need to be <br />removed. Roseville Properties is seeking bids to remove the remaining buildings on their <br />site. We included this work as an alternate in case Roseville Properties was able to get a <br />lower bid for the work. We are recommending that this work be included in the proj ect. <br />Roseville Properties has not found a lower bid for this work and has concurred that the <br />demolition of these buildings be included in the City's contract. This adds $130,000.00 <br />to the base bid. <br />2. Decorative Pavers vs. Decorative Concrete- a portion of the proj ect is adding streetscape <br />detail to the roadway, roundabout areas, and sidewalks. This detail can be provided <br />through colored and stamped concrete or pavers. The base bid included colored concrete. <br />The alternate is to construct this detail with concrete pavers. Staff has concerns about <br />the long term maintenance costs of pavers and longevity. We are recommending that we <br />stay with the base bid for this alternate. This alternate would have added $1506 to the <br />cost of the proj ect. <br />Additional landscaping on Mt. Ridge Road- this alternate is to add additional <br />landscaping through rain gardens along Mt. Ridge Road. In keeping with the green <br />infrastructure goals for this project, staff wanted to know if the addition of these gardens <br />would be within the project budget. These rain gardens are not required to meet the <br />City's or Rice Creek Watershed's rules. We do not recommend that we include this work <br />for this contract. Additional landscaping in this area could be included in a future phase <br />of Twin Lakes area improvements. This alternate would add $37,071 to the cost of the <br />proj ect. <br />4. LED vs. Inductive lighting- The base bid included LED street lights. In the interest of <br />ensuring that the lighting costs would remain within the proj ect budget, we requested an <br />alternate bid for inductive technology lighting. Both technologies have lower energy <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.