My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0615_ Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0615_ Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 2:52:23 PM
Creation date
7/28/2009 2:44:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
afFce orthe Disfric� web site at http:/lricecreek.orglperrn[i/sure#yschedule. <br />An appficant may submit a performance bond or an irr�vocable letier of credit to the District <br />to secure performance of permit conditior�s for activities for whicf� the required surety <br />amaunt as determined ab��e is in excess of $5,000. The performance bond or iefter of <br />credit must be submitied before the �ermit is issued, <br />(c} Form and Contenfs of Performance Bond or �etter of Credit: <br />(1) The performance bond or irra�ocable letter of credit must be in a form <br />acceptable to fhe District and from a surety licensed to do business in Minnesofa. <br />{2) The perfarmance bond or irrevocable letter of credit must be in favor of the <br />District artd conditioned upon the pe�formance of the party obtair�ing the <br />per€ormanc� bond or letker of credit of the activrties auihorized in the �ermit, and <br />compfiance wiih alf applicable laws, including the Districfs rules, the terrr�s and <br />conditions of the permit and payment when due of any fees or other charges <br />required by law, incfuding the pistrict's ruies. The perFormance bond or irrevocable <br />lef#er of credit musi provide that if the perFormance �ond conditions are not met, the <br />District may make a claim against the performance bo�d or letter of credit. <br />{d) Release of Performance 5ur�iy. Upon written notifcatfon firom permittee of <br />cnmpletion of the permitted project, the Disirict wili inspecf #he project to determine if it is <br />constructed in accardance wiih ihe terms of tf�e permit and District rufes. lf the praject is <br />compieted in accordance with tY�e terms of the permit and �istrict rules and the pariy <br />providi�g the performance surety does not have an outstand�ng ba(ance of money owed to <br />the District for the projeci, including but not limiteti to unpaid permit fees, the Districf will <br />release the performance bond or letter of creciit, or return t�e cash surety if applicabfe. <br />�inai inspection compli�nce includ�s, but is not Eimited fo, cnnfirmation that all erosion <br />and sedimenf control BMPs and stormwafer management features have b�en <br />constructed or installed as designed and are fur�ctioning proper�y, and cornpletion of all <br />required monitoring of wefland mi#igation ar�as Tl�e Qistricf may return a portion of fhe <br />surety if it fir�ds that a parkion of t}�e sureYy is no longer warranted ta assure compliance with <br />Disirict rules. <br />RULE C <br />S7�RNfWAi'ER MANAGEMEN�' PLANS <br />1. POLICY. It is fhe policy of f�e Board of Managers to manage stormwafer and snowmelt <br />r�noff on a focal, regional ar subwatershed basis and promate natural infiltration of runoff <br />tf�roughout the District to: <br />(a) Maxim�ze infltra#ion on individual sites fhrough Setter Site besign praciices ar�d <br />ad�anced stormwater management to control runoff �olume increases. <br />(b) Provide effective water quality treatment befare discharge to surface waterbodies <br />and weflands, while considering fhe historic �se of District water features. <br />(c} Ensure fhat fulure peak rafes of runoff are fess than or equal to existing rates. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.