CC_Minutes_2009_0713 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, July 13, 2009 Page 16 Councilmember Johnson spoke in support of the motion; opining that as a neighbor, his family would be impacted; however, advised that he couldn't be happier with Wellington and staff in listening to concerns and reacting to con- structive criticism. Roll Call Ayes: Pust; Roe; Johnson; and Klausing. Nays: Ihlan. Motion carried (super majority vote required/achieved). Klausing moved, Johnson seconded, approval of the FINAL PUD AND PUD AGREEMENT No. 1385 comprising the redevelopment plans and the develop- ment contract between the City of Roseville and Roseville Crossing pertaining to the Planned Unit Development at 1126 Sandhurst Drive and 2167 Lexington Avenue; and establishing the PUD zoning district standards; based on the com- ments and findings of Sections 4-5 and the conditions of Section 6 of the Request for Council Action dated Julyl 3, 2009. Roll Call Ayes: Pust; Roe; Ihlan; Johnson; and Klausing. Nays: Ihlan. Motion carried. Recess Mayor Klausing recessed the meeting at approximately 8:55 p.m. and reconvened at approxi- mately 9:00 p.m. d. Adopt a Resolution Approving Request by Art Mueller for a Comprehensive Land Use Map Amendment, a motion to support Rezoning, and a motion approving the General Concept Planned Unit Development (PUD) to rede- velop the property at 2025 County Road B into a senior living community (PF09-002) City Planner Thomas Paschke briefly updated Councilmembers on the Request for Council Action dated July 13, 2009, following the City Council's previous consideration of this case at their May 11, 2009 meeting, and their action forward- ing the matter back to the Planning Commission for further review based on nu- merous changes to the General Concept Proposal since it was originally heard be- fore the Commissioners. Mr. Paschke noted that the City Council had specifically charged the Planning Commission's review of five items as detailed in the report; and on a 5/2 vote the Planning Commission recommended support of the project as revised. At the request of Mayor Klausing and for the information of the pub- lic attending, Mr. Paschke addressed those specific items, including staff's analy- sis in Section 9 (9.9 - 9.16) of the report and meeting minutes of the Planning Commission indicating their discussion and consideration.