CC_Minutes_2009_0713 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Division Staff's reasons to approve changing the Comp Plan, as found on pages 4-5.) Planning Division Staff Recommendation: 6.O REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ~ a2 6.1 The Roseville Comprehensive Land Use Plan (the future development guide for property t~3 in Roseville) designates the subject parcel as LR, Low Density Residential. During the ~ oa 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update process there was no mention or discussion of this ~ o~ property. The Planning Division considers this parcel to be a land use anomaly that is~t~6 better suited by a High Density residential Land Use designation other than Low Density. 6.4 The Planning Division recommends that the Council's action be concentrated first on the ~ 1~€ Comprehensive Land Use Map Amendment request before discussing zoning and the ~ ~ ~ proposed planned unit development There was, however, much discussion of the need to find potential sites for high-density residential use. Planning Division staff did not call our attention to this ~~land use anomaly" posed by this property at 2025 County Road B, nor other sites where the residential zoning was too low. Our planning consultants did, however, with a map of potential sites in Roseville whose residential zoning should be reexamined as to appropriate density. This site was not included in the list of residential areas needing consideration as to appropriate density. The Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee assessed those sites presented by the Consultant, and added others for the consultant's review. Each member of the Steering Committee was assigned the task to come back to a future meeting with other candidates for higher density. I personally focused on my City Council Remarks July 13, 2009 2