My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2009_0713
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2009
>
CC_Minutes_2009_0713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2010 1:53:16 PM
Creation date
7/30/2009 10:30:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/13/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, July 13, 2009 <br />Page 8 <br />Mr. Pratt noted that Councilmember Ihlan had proposed additional Discussion, <br />provided as a bench handout by staff, however, further noted that staff was not <br />recommending those additional amendments to ensure that the City was not lim- <br />ited in the intent and in their ability to enforce compost storage. Mr. Pratt advised <br />that a property owner maybe storing brush or inappropriate materials on areas of <br />their property, rather than transporting them off-site to free Ramsey County yard <br />waste areas, creating concern for neighbors related to aesthetics, odor and/or ro- <br />dents. Mr. Pratt advised that the draft ordinance was modeled after those of the <br />Cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis, and had not prohibited residents to compost. <br />Mr. Pratt assured Councilmembers, and the public, that staff did not monitor each <br />and every compost container, but should they receive complaints, they would then <br />determine compliance. <br />Councilmember Pust expressed concern that the proposed location of a compost <br />bin was only one foot, rather than five feet from a property line; and sought staffls <br />rationale. Councilmember Pust proposed that, at the onset, the location be revised <br />from one foot (to five feet. <br />Mr. Pratt advised that the one foot provision was in the sample ordinances; and <br />noted that, if managed properly, compost should not have an odor, and if it did, no <br />matter where located, it was in violation. <br />Discussion included sizes for compost containers and their construction dimen- <br />sions; location of compost areas and materials; and whether proposed language <br />was too restrictive. <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that her proposed language was to avoid being too re- <br />strictive, and allowing residents to compost successfully without use of a con- <br />tainer; advising that her sample language revisions were taken from a similar or- <br />dinance in the City of Falcon Heights, and more indicative of larger lot sizes such <br />as Roseville, rather than those smaller lots in Minneapolis and St. Paul, requiring <br />more restrictive provisions. <br />Public Comment <br />Professor Carl J. Rosen <br />Professor Rosen advised that previous discussion had addressed any comments he <br />may include; however, noted that composting without a container may prove eas- <br />ier and could be done successfully. <br />Mayor Klausing clarified with City Attorney Scott Anderson whether any cur- <br />rently existing compost sites outside proper containers could be considered as le- <br />gal, non-conforming uses, making enforcement more difficult. <br />City Attorney Anderson advised that such legal, non-conforming uses applied to <br />the City's zoning ordinance, and that this was related to nuisance and health code <br />enforcement and would not be applicable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.