My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_0824_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_0824_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 3:08:40 PM
Creation date
8/20/2009 3:55:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville. MN - Officia� Website <br />1?age 10 of 14 <br />approximate cost of $15,000 for this study oF tax-supported pragrams <br />and services; and consideration af Town Hall meetings and receipt af <br />electronic feedback from residents at thase meetings, at a cost of <br />�pproximately $3 - 4,000 �er session, in developing and/or <br />maintaining a IeveE of services and programs.. <br />Councilmember Pust personally thanked staff for organizing disparate <br />past conversations for consideration of an alternative f�udgeting <br />process, Councilmember Pust spoke in support of the expendi:ture of <br />the $15,000 to hire a consultant to assis� staff; hawever, she spoke in <br />opposition to additional expenses for electronic voting, apirting that, <br />while nice, this was an unnecessary expenditure afi this time. <br />Councilmember Pust Fu.rtF�er opined that a bigger issue would be to <br />make sure a sufficient number af residents were in attendance at the <br />Town Hall meetings to ensure an accurate picCure af the community. <br />Cauncilmember Rae opined that citizen feedback was im�ortant; and <br />that the impartant thing was to hold the meetir�gs after the data had <br />been compiled by staff and Springsted, but r�ot at �he end of the <br />process and simply a reaction to the propased �010 budget. <br />Cauncilmember Roe reitera�ed his preference for early community <br />feedback in the b�dget process. <br />Councilmember Ihlan sought aciditionaf information from staff on <br />where contingency �t�nding for the study would corr�e from. <br />Mr. Milfer advised that annua!!y, in the Generaf Fund, a�mall amount <br />of funds were kepi aside For unforeseen circumstances or e�e��s <br />thraughout the year; and noted tha� the City had set aside $33,000 <br />that was not specifically cfesignated for 2009. Mr. Miller noted that, <br />historically, the City usually expen.ded betw�en $15-20,000, with <br />some years $75,OD0 needed (i:e., at the height of diseased and <br />hazardous tree removal). Mr. Miller advised that staff felt this was <br />important enough to pursu� to make permanent corrections to the <br />City"s budget structure and con-rpare programs and services <br />throughout the City departmen.ts: <br />Councilmember Aust requested additional informatio� from stafif ai a <br />future meetir�g related to the potential need for additianal funding far <br />the Fire Relief Association's pension plan and unfunded liabilities ta <br />avoid future surpris�s: <br />Mr. Mifler advised that he would provide that informatian with the best <br />inforr�a�ion available at th[s time. <br />Councilmember Johnson ecE�oed C�uncilmember Pusr's comments <br />related to the Springsted s�udy; howe�er, he also spoke in support of <br />the efficiencies in using the electranic method to determine <br />cammunity preferences. <br />Mayor Klausing noted his ambivafence rela�ed to the merit of the <br />electronic version of the "dat metnocf" and his need to furt.her study <br />that issu�; but spoke in support of hiring Springsted for working with <br />staff in preparation of a matrix. <br />Councilmember Roe spoke in support of splitting the <br />http://�v�vw.ci.raseviile.�nn.tis/archive.aspx?AMID=&T�pe=&AD1D=b44&PREVIEW=YES 8/19/2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.