My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0820_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0820_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:30 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 2:54:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attacl�ment a <br />Single-Family Residential I.ot Split Study Fiepori May 14,2007 <br />OtherStandardsand Ordinances <br />The CAG discussed a number of other standards and ordinances as they pertain to lot subdivision <br />regu�a�ior�. Throughout the study, negative environmental externalities associated with single-family <br />residential subdivisions were a concern for CAG members �s well as those who participated in the <br />neighborhood survey and Community Open House. Stormwater rnai�agement and tree removal <br />were recurrent themes. Although these topics were outside the general parameters of the study due <br />to time constraints, the CAG fElt that they were significant issues and warranted further study. <br />Generally, the group discussed how the Czty could minimize environmental impacts created through <br />not only single-family development but all development, and ultimately recommends that the City <br />Council should consider creating incentives for enviro�mentalty� friendly development practices. A <br />more specific discussion focused an tree preservation and replacement regulation. Currently, neither <br />the Subdivision Code nor Zoning Code has specific language requiring tree inventories or studies. <br />As such, the CAG recommends that the City Council should consider a tree preservation and <br />replacement ordinance. <br />SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS <br />The following provides a list of the Single-Family Residential Lot Split Study C11�G's <br />recommendations to the City Council and are organized by the code in which they seek to change or <br />amend. After significant discussion, all but one of these recommendations are consensus-based <br />recommendations. <br />�- General Sin�fe-��milv Residential Subdivision Policy <br />.. The City Council should continue to allow single-family residentiallots to be subdivided or <br />split if they meet the standards set forward by the City Code. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />�,� SubdivisionCode <br />S. The City Council should not determine lot size using a formula ("sliding scale") based on the <br />relative sizes of surrounding residential lots. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />^. The City Council should amend the Subdivision Ordinance to include variance language not <br />currently found in this code by reiterating the variance language found in the Zoning Code. <br />(Consensus Recommendation) <br />� The City Council should a.ine�d the lot line requirement within the Subdivision Ordinance <br />to require that lot lines are perpendicular to the front property line unless a variance is <br />obtained. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />�� 'The City Council should amend the Subdivision Ordinance to allow single-familylots to be <br />served by private streets if approval of the private street is conditioned on a legal mechanism <br />(c.g. neighborhood associations) beingin place to fund seasonal and ongoing maintenance <br />and that the street cannot be gated or restrict traffic. (Consensus Recommendations) <br />5. The City Council should amend the Subdivision Code to require that new houses being <br />placed on new streets within a new development access the new street in that subdivision <br />(Consensus Recn��rnendat�on} <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.