My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_0820_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2007
>
2007_0820_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2012 12:41:30 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 2:54:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Singl�Family Residential Lot Splix Study Report <br />May 14,2007 <br />The City Council should consider recombination and subsequent re-subdivision of singic- <br />family residentiallots no differently than other subdivision rcq�ests.(Consens�s <br />Recommendation) <br />-.�.. The City Council should allow the creation of flag lots and continue to hear them through <br />thevarianceprocess. (MajorityRecommendation-6votes) <br />'.1�. The City Council should prohibit the creation of flag lots within the City. (Minority <br />Recommendation —2 votes) <br />Zortin� Code <br />The City Council should designate three levels of single-familyresidentialzoning districts, <br />which include the following districts: (Consensus Recommendation) <br />9 Small lot single-familyresidential, which would ha�e standards less than the current <br />standards; <br />9 Standard single-familyresidential, which would have the same standards as the <br />current R1 district; and <br />9 Lakeshore single-family residential, which would ha�e standards equal to that set <br />forward in the City's Shoreland Zoning Ordinance. <br />�. 'I"he City Council should not create a large lot zoning district. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />'�. When a small lot singl�-family residential zoning district is designated, the City Council <br />should review the standards in the Zoning Code far this district to ensure appropriate <br />building height and setbacks requirements. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />�. In addition to the new zoning districts, the City Council should designate an overlay zoning <br />district for single-family lots platted prior to May 21,1959 to ensure that they reina�n <br />legally nonconforming lots. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />w The City Council should evaluate the fees associated with the e�sting planned unit <br />development process. (Consensus Reeo�nmenda�ion) <br />b The City Council should amend the preamble of the Zoning Code with the following <br />language: "...for the purpose of protecting and enhancing the character, stability, and vitality <br />of residen�ial neighbarhoods as well as commercial areas." (Consensus Recommendation) <br />1� Other Citv Standard� and Ordinances <br />The City Council should consider creating incentives for environmentallyfriendly <br />development practices. (Consensus Recommendation) <br />The City Council should consider a tree preservation and replacement ordinance. <br />(Consensus Recommendation) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.