Laserfiche WebLink
3� <br />3� <br />_#7 <br />_�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />� :} <br />�� <br />�� <br />..�� <br />�� � <br />�i� <br />��. <br />�� <br />�I <br />5; <br />-�� <br />�� <br />5� <br />5 fi <br />5 �r <br />5� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�l <br />6� <br />Vy <br />.� <br />65 <br />�� <br />�� <br />�� <br />�;� <br />3.3 After the interviews on August 27, staffrecommends that the City Council formally select a <br />consultant forthe City of Roseville Comprehensive Plcm process. Staffivould then negotiate <br />a fuurl co�ttract with the chosen consultantwith a not to e.�eed amou��t forthe project. <br />3.4 Each ofthe three planning consultants has proprnssed the use ofa steerzng committee as �t <br />ofthe comprehensive planning process. The purpose ofa steerzng committee is to act as c� <br />advisory body durzng this update. Staffis recommending the followingcomposition ofthe <br />steerzng committee: <br />4.0 <br />4.1 <br />� City Council-2 members <br />� Planning Commission-2 members <br />� Parks cn� Recreation �'��mr�i��;�*�--1 member <br />� Public Works cn� EnvironmentCommission-1 member <br />� Housingcn�RedevelopmentAuthorzty-1 member <br />* Vision 2025 Steerzng Committee-1 member <br />� Community-at-Large-2 members <br />Staffis also recommending that membership on the committee not e.�eed eleven total <br />members. <br />REQUESTED COi7�TCILIPL.ANNi1�(� COMIVIISSIONDIRECTION: <br />Staffis requesting that the CouncillPiana�i�� Commission provide direction to staffon the <br />followingitems: <br />a. Proposed schedule cn� milestones; <br />b. Council interviews ofconsulting fzrmscn� selection process; c� <br />c. The composition ofthe aComprehensivePlanning SteerzngCommittee <br />Attachments: A. Decision MakingMatrzx <br />B. General Comprehensive Planning Organizational Structure <br />7� Pre�ed by: Michael Ua�owl3a�ie Radel, Community Development <br />�'-gf _� 1782Q07 Compr�ehensive Plan Update <br />