Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />lo <br />I1 <br />�. 2 <br />13 <br />14 <br />�. 5 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />�.9 <br />20 <br />�� <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />Regu�ar City Cnuncil Meeti�g <br />Manday, A�gust 13, 2007 <br />Page 30 <br />the legi�lature was anticipating that would �require and EAW, and in <br />fact prohib�ted �hat so�t ai assessment in those eontexts. <br />Counc�lm�mber Ro� o��'ered, and Mayor Klausing accepted, a friendly <br />amendmen� to �he resolution. <br />Revised Mation Language <br />K�aus�ng moved, Pust seconded, adoption of Reso�ut�on Na. 10540 <br />ent�tled, "A. Reso�ution DENY�NG the Citizen PeCition for an Envi- <br />�onmenta� Assessment Worksheet (EAW) foar �he Art Mue��er Subdi- <br />vision Plat a� Oak Acres, 2201 Acorn Road (PF07-439);" amended as <br />follows: <br />Page '[, 3`d "WNER�AS. <br />"WF{�R�AS, Minnesota Rules 441(l.[9?00] sei forif� the pracedures ia be fol- <br />lowed in rt�aking a decision on the Citizen Petition; and" <br />Page Z, °`NOW THER�FOR� B� IT R�S4LV�b..." <br />a} Minnesota Rules 441�-%9 [4470.4800] {Exemptions}, subpari 12 {Resi- <br />denfial Developments) A. (3} �X�MPTS residentiai develnpments iess <br />than �}0 units in a second class city; Cno part of which is within a shnre- <br />land area, L±F.'Illl�''c?�E"CI fI00t� (�It1171r s#ate ar federally designaied wild <br />and scenic river district, fhe Minnesata Rrver Proj�et are�a, or fhe Mis- <br />sissippi headwaters area is ex�mp#�. <br />Ci�y At�orney Anderson clarified that the only issue b��ore the City <br />Counci� �onight was whethe� this peti�ion �or an EAW should bc <br />gxanted, or d�nied as recommended by sta£�'. <br />29 Mayor Klausing, when asked by Councilmember Kough, noted that <br />30 the deve�oper had yet to submit a S��e Plan; but noted �hat there could <br />31 be no net increase to runoff and that any additional wat�� needed to be <br />32 controlled on site based on �he developer's engineering study, and xe- <br />33 view and approval/denial by thc �ifiy's engine��r. <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />3S <br />39 <br />40 <br />Councilmember �hlan expressed her disappointmen� in noi xceeiving <br />a copy of �he citizen petition until �kais afternaon, after she'd asked for <br />a copy. Councilmember Ihlan opined that she dzdn't believe i� was <br />clear if th�s was an exempt project and nc�ded additional time to xe- <br />vzew at be£ore City Counci� action. <br />